↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU128+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.20s 1.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  27   ~;  22   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  28   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = set_intersection2(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,B)
            & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t19_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( subset(A,C)
        & subset(A,B) )
     => subset(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t19_xboole_1) ).

fof(t19_xboole_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( subset(A,C)
          & subset(A,B) )
       => subset(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [C] :
            ( ~ in(C,B)
            & in(C,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
          & in(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(C,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( in(C,B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( ~ in(D,B)
    | ~ in(D,A)
    | in(D,C)
    | set_intersection2(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_15,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ subset(A,set_intersection2(B,C))
      & subset(A,C)
      & subset(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t19_xboole_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t19_xboole_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3))
    & subset(sK1,sK3)
    & subset(sK1,sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK3)],[nnf_15]) ).

cnf(c_36,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t19_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK1,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t19_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t19_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | ~ in(A,C)
    | in(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    ( in(A,sK2)
    | ~ in(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_103,plain,
    ( in(A,sK3)
    | ~ in(A,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_37,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_38]) ).

cnf(c_737,plain,
    in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_738,plain,
    in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_102]) ).

cnf(c_5127,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),sK2)
    | ~ in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_105]) ).

cnf(c_5128,plain,
    ~ in(sK0(sK1,set_intersection2(sK2,sK3)),sK2),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5127,c_737]) ).

cnf(c_5126,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_738,c_5128]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU128+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:43:58 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 1397307 was started by sandbox on n001,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 08:43:58 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 4.20/1.02  
% 4.20/1.02  % given #500 (T,wt=20): 4595 set_intersection2(c3,A) = empty_set | set_intersection2(c5,A) != empty_set.  [resolve(89,d,367,b),merge(d),unit_del(b,101)].
% 4.20/1.02  
% 4.20/1.02  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 4.20/1.02  
% 4.20/1.02  % Proof 1 at 0.47 (+ 0.17) seconds.
% 4.20/1.02  % Length of proof is 20.
% 4.20/1.02  % Level of proof is 4.
% 4.20/1.02  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 4.20/1.02  % Given clauses 542.
% 4.20/1.02  
% 4.20/1.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------