↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU129+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SEU129+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:35:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.51  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.51  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.51  SPASS derived 539 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 212 clauses.
% 0.21/0.51  SPASS allocated 98281 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.51  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.51  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.51  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.51  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.51  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.51  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 11 :
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.51  3[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc5,skc6)*r.
% 0.21/0.51  9[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(set_intersection2(u,v),u)*l.
% 0.21/0.51  15[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),set_intersection2(v,u))*.
% 0.21/0.51  24[0:Inp] || subset(set_intersection2(skc5,skc7),set_intersection2(skc6,skc7))*r -> .
% 0.21/0.51  39[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> subset(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.51  45[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(u,w)* -> subset(u,set_intersection2(w,v))*.
% 0.21/0.51  67[0:Res:45.2,24.0] || subset(set_intersection2(skc5,skc7),skc7)*l subset(set_intersection2(skc5,skc7),skc6) -> .
% 0.21/0.51  215[0:SpR:15.0,9.0] ||  -> subset(set_intersection2(u,v),v)*l.
% 0.21/0.51  220[0:MRR:67.0,215.0] || subset(set_intersection2(skc5,skc7),skc6)*l -> .
% 0.21/0.51  650[0:NCh:39.2,39.0,220.0,9.0] || subset(skc5,skc6)*r -> .
% 0.21/0.51  655[0:MRR:650.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.51  Formulae used in the proof : t26_xboole_1 t17_xboole_1 commutativity_k3_xboole_0 t1_xboole_1 t19_xboole_1
% 0.21/0.51  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------