↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SEU130+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:01:12 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.57s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SEU130+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 16:22:39 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.55/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.57/0.64  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.64  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.57/0.64  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.57/0.64  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.57/0.64  
% 0.57/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.020000s
% 0.57/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.020000s
% 0.57/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.64  % File     : SEU130+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.57/0.64  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.57/0.64  % Problem  : MPTP bushy problem t28_xboole_1
% 0.57/0.64  % Version  : [Urb07] axioms : Especial.
% 0.57/0.65  % English  :
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  % Refs     : [Ban01] Bancerek et al. (2001), On the Characterizations of Co
% 0.57/0.65  %          : [Urb07] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.57/0.65  % Source   : [Urb07]
% 0.57/0.65  % Names    : bushy-t28_xboole_1 [Urb07]
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.57/0.65  % Rating   : 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.04 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.17 v5.5.0, 0.15 v5.4.0, 0.18 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.12 v4.1.0, 0.13 v4.0.1, 0.17 v4.0.0, 0.21 v3.7.0, 0.15 v3.5.0, 0.16 v3.4.0, 0.21 v3.3.0
% 0.57/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 def)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :   31 (   8 equ)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Number of connectives :   18 (   5   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.57/0.65  %                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.57/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   29 (  27   !;   2   ?)
% 0.57/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.57/0.65  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.57/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.65  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] :
% 0.57/0.65        ( in(A,B)
% 0.57/0.65       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] :
% 0.57/0.65        ( A = B
% 0.57/0.65      <=> ( subset(A,B)
% 0.57/0.65          & subset(B,A) ) ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] :
% 0.57/0.65        ( subset(A,B)
% 0.57/0.65      <=> ! [C] :
% 0.57/0.65            ( in(C,A)
% 0.57/0.65           => in(C,B) ) ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.57/0.65        ( C = set_intersection2(A,B)
% 0.57/0.65      <=> ! [D] :
% 0.57/0.65            ( in(D,C)
% 0.57/0.65          <=> ( in(D,A)
% 0.57/0.65              & in(D,B) ) ) ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(dt_k1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      $true ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(dt_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      $true ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(idempotence_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] : set_intersection2(A,A) = A ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(t17_xboole_1,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] : subset(set_intersection2(A,B),A) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(t28_xboole_1,conjecture,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] :
% 0.57/0.65        ( subset(A,B)
% 0.57/0.65       => set_intersection2(A,B) = A ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(t2_boole,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A] : set_intersection2(A,empty_set) = empty_set ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(t6_boole,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A] :
% 0.57/0.65        ( empty(A)
% 0.57/0.65       => A = empty_set ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(t7_boole,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] :
% 0.57/0.65        ~ ( in(A,B)
% 0.57/0.65          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  fof(t8_boole,axiom,
% 0.57/0.65      ! [A,B] :
% 0.57/0.65        ~ ( empty(A)
% 0.57/0.65          & A != B
% 0.57/0.65          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.57/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.57/0.65  %ClaNum:41(EqnAxiom:15)
% 0.57/0.65  %VarNum:112(SingletonVarNum:46)
% 0.57/0.65  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.57/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.57/0.65  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.57/0.65  %goalClause: 18 25
% 0.57/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.57/0.65  [16]P1(a1)
% 0.57/0.65  [17]P1(a2)
% 0.57/0.65  [18]P2(a5,a7)
% 0.57/0.65  [24]~P1(a6)
% 0.57/0.65  [25]~E(f8(a5,a7),a5)
% 0.57/0.65  [20]P2(x201,x201)
% 0.57/0.65  [19]E(f8(x191,a1),a1)
% 0.57/0.65  [21]E(f8(x211,x211),x211)
% 0.57/0.65  [22]E(f8(x221,x222),f8(x222,x221))
% 0.57/0.65  [23]P2(f8(x231,x232),x231)
% 0.57/0.65  [26]~P1(x261)+E(x261,a1)
% 0.57/0.65  [29]~E(x291,x292)+P2(x291,x292)
% 0.57/0.65  [30]~P1(x301)+~P3(x302,x301)
% 0.57/0.65  [31]~P3(x312,x311)+~P3(x311,x312)
% 0.57/0.65  [33]P2(x331,x332)+P3(f3(x331,x332),x331)
% 0.57/0.65  [37]P2(x371,x372)+~P3(f3(x371,x372),x372)
% 0.57/0.65  [27]~P1(x272)+~P1(x271)+E(x271,x272)
% 0.57/0.65  [32]~P2(x322,x321)+~P2(x321,x322)+E(x321,x322)
% 0.57/0.65  [34]~P2(x343,x342)+P3(x341,x342)+~P3(x341,x343)
% 0.57/0.65  [39]P3(f4(x392,x393,x391),x391)+P3(f4(x392,x393,x391),x393)+E(x391,f8(x392,x393))
% 0.57/0.65  [40]P3(f4(x402,x403,x401),x401)+P3(f4(x402,x403,x401),x402)+E(x401,f8(x402,x403))
% 0.57/0.65  [35]~P3(x351,x353)+P3(x351,x352)+~E(x353,f8(x354,x352))
% 0.57/0.65  [36]~P3(x361,x363)+P3(x361,x362)+~E(x363,f8(x362,x364))
% 0.57/0.65  [41]~P3(f4(x412,x413,x411),x411)+~P3(f4(x412,x413,x411),x413)+~P3(f4(x412,x413,x411),x412)+E(x411,f8(x412,x413))
% 0.57/0.65  [38]~P3(x381,x384)+~P3(x381,x383)+P3(x381,x382)+~E(x382,f8(x383,x384))
% 0.57/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.57/0.65  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.57/0.65  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.57/0.65  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.57/0.65  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f8(x41,x43),f8(x42,x43))
% 0.57/0.65  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f8(x53,x51),f8(x53,x52))
% 0.57/0.65  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61,x63,x64),f4(x62,x63,x64))
% 0.57/0.65  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f4(x73,x71,x74),f4(x73,x72,x74))
% 0.57/0.65  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x83,x84,x81),f4(x83,x84,x82))
% 0.57/0.65  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f3(x91,x93),f3(x92,x93))
% 0.57/0.65  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f3(x103,x101),f3(x103,x102))
% 0.57/0.65  [11]~P1(x111)+P1(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.57/0.65  [12]P3(x122,x123)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x121,x123)
% 0.57/0.65  [13]P3(x133,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x131)
% 0.57/0.65  [14]P2(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x141,x143)
% 0.57/0.65  [15]P2(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P2(x153,x151)
% 0.57/0.65  
% 0.57/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x431,f8(x432,x433))+P3(x431,x433)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(equality_inference,[],[35])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x441,f8(x442,x443))+P3(x441,x442)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(equality_inference,[],[36])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(45,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x451,x452)+~P3(x451,x453)+P3(x451,f8(x453,x452))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(equality_inference,[],[38])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (E(x461,f8(x461,x461))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,2])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(53,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (E(f8(x531,x531),x531)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(rename_variables,[],[21])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(54,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (P2(f8(a5,a5),a7)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,16,2,30,32,3,14])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(56,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x561,f8(f8(x562,a1),f8(x562,a1)))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,16,2,30,32,3,14,15,35])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (E(f8(x571,x571),x571)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(rename_variables,[],[21])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(59,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x591,f8(f8(a1,x592),f8(a1,x592)))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,16,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (E(f8(x601,x601),x601)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(rename_variables,[],[21])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(62,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x621,f8(x622,a1))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,16,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (E(f8(x651,x651),x651)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(rename_variables,[],[21])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~E(a7,a1)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,60,16,24,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45,11,39,13])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(69,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (P3(f4(a5,a7,a7),f8(f8(a7,a7),f8(a7,a7)))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,60,65,16,24,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45,11,39,13,38])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(74,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~E(a5,f8(a5,a7))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,60,65,16,24,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45,11,39,13,38,41,29])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(87,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (P3(f4(a5,a7,a5),a5)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,60,65,16,24,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45,11,39,13,38,41,29,43,44,5,26,31,27,40])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(90,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~E(a5,a7)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,60,65,16,24,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45,11,39,13,38,41,29,43,44,5,26,31,27,40,12,8])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(91,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (P3(f4(a5,a7,a5),a7)),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,25,23,21,53,57,60,65,16,24,2,30,32,3,14,15,35,36,45,11,39,13,38,41,29,43,44,5,26,31,27,40,12,8,34])).
% 0.57/0.65  cnf(94,plain,
% 0.57/0.65     (~P3(x941,f8(x942,a1))),
% 0.57/0.65     inference(rename_variables,[],[62])).
% 0.57/0.66  cnf(108,plain,
% 0.57/0.66     (E(f8(x1081,x1082),f8(x1082,x1081))),
% 0.57/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[22])).
% 0.57/0.66  cnf(111,plain,
% 0.57/0.66     (E(x1111,f8(x1111,x1111))),
% 0.57/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[46])).
% 0.57/0.66  cnf(116,plain,
% 0.57/0.66     (E(x1161,f8(x1161,x1161))),
% 0.57/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[46])).
% 0.57/0.66  cnf(118,plain,
% 0.57/0.66     (E(x1181,f8(x1181,x1181))),
% 0.57/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[46])).
% 0.57/0.66  cnf(126,plain,
% 0.57/0.66     ($false),
% 0.57/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,46,111,116,118,91,54,56,59,62,94,69,74,90,22,108,87,17,68,19,33,30,44,31,2,43,32,36,14,45,3,15,12,13,11,38,41]),
% 0.57/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.66  % Total time :0.020000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------