↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU130+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.73s 16.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (  18 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  191 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  201 (  78   ~;  81   |;  34   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  105 (   0 sgn  98   !;   7   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( in(X3,X1)
            & in(X3,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(set_intersection2(X0,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_xboole_1) ).

fof(f14,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
     => set_intersection2(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t28_xboole_1) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( subset(X0,X1)
       => set_intersection2(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f14]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X0)
          | in(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      & set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
            & ~ in(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ in(X3,X0)
            | in(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
            & ~ in(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ in(X3,X0)
            | in(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( in(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f31]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X2)
              | ( in(X4,X1)
                & in(X4,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X4,X1)
              | ~ in(X4,X0)
              | in(X4,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X3,X2)
              | ~ in(X3,X1)
              | ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X2)
              | ( in(X4,X1)
                & in(X4,X0) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X4,X1)
              | ~ in(X4,X0)
              | in(X4,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( in(sK1(X0,X1,X2),X2)
            | ( in(sK1(X0,X1,X2),X1)
              & in(sK1(X0,X1,X2),X0) ) )
          & ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1,X2),X2)
            | ~ in(sK1(X0,X1,X2),X1)
            | ~ in(sK1(X0,X1,X2),X0) ) )
        | X2 = set_intersection2(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X3,sK1(X0,X1,X2))],[f35]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ( subset(sK4,sK5)
    & sK4 != set_intersection2(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5]),skolemize(X0,sK4),skolemize(X1,sK5)],[f24]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(X3,X0)
      | in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) != X2
      | ~ in(X4,X1)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(set_intersection2(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    subset(sK4,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    sK4 != set_intersection2(sK4,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4] :
      ( ~ in(X4,X1)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | in(X4,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f50]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_intersection2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | in(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X2)
      | ~ subset(X1,X2)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,set_intersection2(X2,X1))
      | ~ in(X0,X2)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : subset(set_intersection2(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

tcf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(sK4,sK5) != sK4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

tcf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK4,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

tcf(c_422,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = set_intersection2(sK4,sK5),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_423,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK4,sK5),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).

tcf(c_424,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 != sK4,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_422]) ).

tcf(c_697,plain,
    subset(iPr_def_10,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_422,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_716,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : subset(set_intersection2(X0,X1),X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_811,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X2)
      | in(sK0(X0,X2),X1)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_827,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X1,X0) = X0 )
      | ~ subset(X0,set_intersection2(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_716,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_930,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = sK4 )
    | ~ subset(iPr_def_10,sK4)
    | ~ subset(sK4,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_970,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( in(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ in(X0,sK5)
      | ~ in(X0,sK4) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_422,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_1351,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(X1,X0) = X0 )
      | ~ subset(X0,set_intersection2(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_827]) ).

tcf(c_1370,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subset(sK4,X0)
      | in(sK0(sK4,X0),iPr_def_10)
      | ~ in(sK0(sK4,X0),sK5) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_970]) ).

tcf(c_2169,plain,
    ( ( set_intersection2(sK5,sK4) = sK4 )
    | ~ subset(sK4,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_422,c_1351]) ).

tcf(c_2174,plain,
    ~ subset(sK4,iPr_def_10),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_2169,c_424,c_697,c_930]) ).

tcf(c_5093,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subset(sK4,X0)
      | in(sK0(sK4,X0),iPr_def_10)
      | ~ subset(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_811,c_1370]) ).

tcf(c_5095,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subset(sK4,X0)
      | in(sK0(sK4,X0),iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5093,c_423]) ).

tcf(c_5209,plain,
    subset(sK4,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5095,c_54]) ).

tcf(c_5212,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5209,c_2174]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU130+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/15.40  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/15.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/15.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/15.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/15.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/15.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/15.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/15.40  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:49:39 UTC 2026
% 0.10/15.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/15.40  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/15.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/15.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/15.46  
% 0.10/15.46  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/15.46  
% 0.10/15.46  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/15.47  % Proving...
% 2.73/16.32  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/16.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.73/16.32  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.73/16.32  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Proving...
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % 
% 2.73/16.32  % clauses                               25
% 2.73/16.32  % conjectures                           2
% 2.73/16.32  % EPR                                   12
% 2.73/16.32  % Horn                                  22
% 2.73/16.32  % unary                                 11
% 2.73/16.32  % binary                                7
% 2.73/16.32  % lits                                  47
% 2.73/16.32  % lits eq                               11
% 2.73/16.32  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.73/16.32  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.73/16.32  % fd_cond                               1
% 2.73/16.32  % fd_pseudo_cond                        5
% 2.73/16.32  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ 
% 2.73/16.32  % Current options:
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % ------ Proving...
% 2.73/16.32  % 
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.73/16.32  
% 2.73/16.32  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------