%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SEU130+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:42:40 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 9.86s 2.12s % Output : Proof 11.64s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU130+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0. % 0.06/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 14:31:13 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.59 ________ _____ % 0.21/0.59 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.21/0.59 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.21/0.59 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.21/0.59 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.21/0.59 % 0.21/0.59 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.21/0.59 (2023-06-19) % 0.21/0.59 % 0.21/0.59 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.21/0.59 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.21/0.59 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.21/0.59 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.21/0.59 % 0.21/0.59 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.21/0.59 % 0.21/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.21/0.60 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.21/0.62 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.21/0.62 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.21/0.62 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.21/0.62 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.21/0.62 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.21/0.62 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.21/0.62 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.76/1.06 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.76/1.06 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.06/1.10 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.06/1.10 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.06/1.10 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 3.06/1.10 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.06/1.10 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 5.92/1.51 Prover 5: Proving ... % 5.92/1.52 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.92/1.56 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.53/1.58 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.59/1.59 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.59/1.60 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.74/1.62 Prover 2: Proving ... % 6.82/1.63 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.82/1.63 Prover 6: Proving ... % 6.82/1.69 Prover 0: Proving ... % 9.37/1.98 Prover 1: gave up % 9.37/1.98 Prover 3: gave up % 9.37/2.00 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 9.37/2.00 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 9.86/2.06 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 9.86/2.06 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 9.86/2.12 Prover 0: proved (1510ms) % 9.86/2.12 % 9.86/2.12 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 9.86/2.12 % 9.86/2.12 Prover 6: stopped % 9.86/2.12 Prover 5: stopped % 9.86/2.12 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 9.86/2.12 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 9.86/2.12 Prover 2: stopped % 9.86/2.12 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 10.51/2.13 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683 % 10.51/2.17 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 10.51/2.18 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 10.51/2.18 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 10.51/2.18 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 10.51/2.18 Prover 4: Found proof (size 38) % 10.95/2.18 Prover 4: proved (1572ms) % 10.95/2.19 Prover 10: stopped % 10.95/2.19 Prover 16: Preprocessing ... % 10.95/2.19 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 10.95/2.20 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 10.95/2.20 Prover 7: stopped % 10.95/2.22 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 10.95/2.22 Prover 16: stopped % 10.95/2.22 Prover 13: stopped % 10.95/2.23 Prover 8: stopped % 10.95/2.23 Prover 11: stopped % 10.95/2.23 % 10.95/2.23 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 10.95/2.23 % 10.95/2.24 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 10.95/2.24 Assumptions after simplification: % 10.95/2.24 --------------------------------- % 10.95/2.24 % 10.95/2.24 (commutativity_k3_xboole_0) % 11.42/2.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v1, v0) = v2) % 11.42/2.27 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | (set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2))) & ! % 11.42/2.27 [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2) | % 11.42/2.27 ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | (set_intersection2(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v2))) % 11.42/2.27 % 11.42/2.27 (d10_xboole_0) % 11.42/2.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v1, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | % 11.42/2.27 ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) = v2)) & ! [v0: $i] % 11.42/2.27 : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | % 11.42/2.27 ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v1, v0) = v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: % 11.42/2.27 int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0)) % 11.42/2.27 % 11.42/2.27 (t17_xboole_1) % 11.42/2.27 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2) % 11.42/2.27 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | subset(v2, v0) = 0) % 11.42/2.27 % 11.42/2.27 (t19_xboole_1) % 11.42/2.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 % 11.42/2.28 | ~ (subset(v0, v3) = v4) | ~ (set_intersection2(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) % 11.42/2.28 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] : (subset(v0, v2) = v6 % 11.42/2.28 & subset(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | ~ (v5 = 0)))) % 11.42/2.28 % 11.42/2.28 (t28_xboole_1) % 11.42/2.28 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ( ~ (v2 = v0) & subset(v0, v1) = 0 & % 11.42/2.28 set_intersection2(v0, v1) = v2 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) % 11.42/2.28 % 11.42/2.28 (function-axioms) % 11.42/2.28 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! % 11.42/2.28 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (disjoint(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (disjoint(v3, v2) = v0)) % 11.42/2.28 & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! % 11.42/2.28 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) & % 11.42/2.28 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 11.42/2.28 (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! % 11.42/2.28 [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 11.42/2.28 (set_union2(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (set_union2(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 11.42/2.28 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] % 11.42/2.28 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: % 11.42/2.28 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | % 11.42/2.28 ~ (empty(v2) = v1) | ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) % 11.42/2.28 % 11.42/2.28 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 11.42/2.28 -------------------------------------------- % 11.42/2.28 antisymmetry_r2_hidden, commutativity_k2_xboole_0, d1_xboole_0, d2_xboole_0, % 11.42/2.28 d3_tarski, d3_xboole_0, d7_xboole_0, dt_k1_xboole_0, dt_k2_xboole_0, % 11.42/2.28 dt_k3_xboole_0, fc1_xboole_0, fc2_xboole_0, fc3_xboole_0, % 11.42/2.28 idempotence_k2_xboole_0, idempotence_k3_xboole_0, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, % 11.42/2.28 reflexivity_r1_tarski, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, t12_xboole_1, t1_boole, % 11.42/2.28 t1_xboole_1, t26_xboole_1, t2_boole, t2_xboole_1, t3_xboole_0, t3_xboole_1, % 11.42/2.28 t4_xboole_0, t6_boole, t7_boole, t7_xboole_1, t8_boole, t8_xboole_1 % 11.42/2.28 % 11.42/2.28 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 11.42/2.28 --------------------------------- % 11.42/2.28 % 11.42/2.28 Begin of proof % 11.42/2.28 | % 11.42/2.28 | ALPHA: (commutativity_k3_xboole_0) implies: % 11.42/2.29 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (set_intersection2(v1, % 11.42/2.29 | v0) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | (set_intersection2(v0, v1) = % 11.42/2.29 | v2 & $i(v2))) % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | ALPHA: (d10_xboole_0) implies: % 11.42/2.29 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 | ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1) | ~ % 11.42/2.29 | $i(v0)) % 11.42/2.29 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v1, v0) = 0) | ~ % 11.42/2.29 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) = % 11.42/2.29 | v2)) % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies: % 11.42/2.29 | (4) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : % 11.42/2.29 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (subset(v3, v2) % 11.42/2.29 | = v0)) % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | DELTA: instantiating (t28_xboole_1) with fresh symbols all_40_0, all_40_1, % 11.42/2.29 | all_40_2 gives: % 11.42/2.29 | (5) ~ (all_40_0 = all_40_2) & subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = 0 & % 11.42/2.29 | set_intersection2(all_40_2, all_40_1) = all_40_0 & $i(all_40_0) & % 11.42/2.29 | $i(all_40_1) & $i(all_40_2) % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | ALPHA: (5) implies: % 11.42/2.29 | (6) ~ (all_40_0 = all_40_2) % 11.42/2.29 | (7) $i(all_40_2) % 11.42/2.29 | (8) $i(all_40_1) % 11.42/2.29 | (9) set_intersection2(all_40_2, all_40_1) = all_40_0 % 11.42/2.29 | (10) subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = 0 % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_40_1, all_40_2, all_40_0, simplifying % 11.42/2.29 | with (7), (8), (9) gives: % 11.42/2.29 | (11) set_intersection2(all_40_1, all_40_2) = all_40_0 & $i(all_40_0) % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | ALPHA: (11) implies: % 11.42/2.29 | (12) $i(all_40_0) % 11.42/2.29 | (13) set_intersection2(all_40_1, all_40_2) = all_40_0 % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t17_xboole_1) with all_40_2, all_40_1, all_40_0, % 11.42/2.29 | simplifying with (7), (8), (9) gives: % 11.42/2.29 | (14) subset(all_40_0, all_40_2) = 0 % 11.42/2.29 | % 11.42/2.29 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_40_2, all_40_0, simplifying with (7), % 11.42/2.29 | (12), (14) gives: % 11.42/2.30 | (15) all_40_0 = all_40_2 | ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & subset(all_40_2, % 11.42/2.30 | all_40_0) = v0) % 11.42/2.30 | % 11.42/2.30 | BETA: splitting (15) gives: % 11.42/2.30 | % 11.42/2.30 | Case 1: % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | (16) all_40_0 = all_40_2 % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | REDUCE: (6), (16) imply: % 11.42/2.30 | | (17) $false % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | CLOSE: (17) is inconsistent. % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | Case 2: % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | (18) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & subset(all_40_2, all_40_0) = v0) % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | DELTA: instantiating (18) with fresh symbol all_70_0 gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | (19) ~ (all_70_0 = 0) & subset(all_40_2, all_40_0) = all_70_0 % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | ALPHA: (19) implies: % 11.42/2.30 | | (20) ~ (all_70_0 = 0) % 11.42/2.30 | | (21) subset(all_40_2, all_40_0) = all_70_0 % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t19_xboole_1) with all_40_2, all_40_1, all_40_2, % 11.42/2.30 | | all_40_0, all_70_0, simplifying with (7), (8), (13), (21) % 11.42/2.30 | | gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | (22) all_70_0 = 0 | ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_40_2, % 11.42/2.30 | | all_40_1) = v0 & subset(all_40_2, all_40_2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) % 11.42/2.30 | | | ~ (v0 = 0))) % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t19_xboole_1) with all_40_2, all_40_2, all_40_1, % 11.42/2.30 | | all_40_0, all_70_0, simplifying with (7), (8), (9), (21) gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | (23) all_70_0 = 0 | ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_40_2, % 11.42/2.30 | | all_40_1) = v1 & subset(all_40_2, all_40_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) % 11.42/2.30 | | | ~ (v0 = 0))) % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | BETA: splitting (22) gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | % 11.42/2.30 | | Case 1: % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | (24) all_70_0 = 0 % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | REDUCE: (20), (24) imply: % 11.42/2.30 | | | (25) $false % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | CLOSE: (25) is inconsistent. % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | Case 2: % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | (26) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = v0 & % 11.42/2.30 | | | subset(all_40_2, all_40_2) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0))) % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | DELTA: instantiating (26) with fresh symbols all_105_0, all_105_1 gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | | (27) subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = all_105_1 & subset(all_40_2, % 11.42/2.30 | | | all_40_2) = all_105_0 & ( ~ (all_105_0 = 0) | ~ (all_105_1 = % 11.42/2.30 | | | 0)) % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | ALPHA: (27) implies: % 11.42/2.30 | | | (28) subset(all_40_2, all_40_2) = all_105_0 % 11.42/2.30 | | | (29) subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = all_105_1 % 11.42/2.30 | | | (30) ~ (all_105_0 = 0) | ~ (all_105_1 = 0) % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | BETA: splitting (23) gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | Case 1: % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | | (31) all_70_0 = 0 % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | | REDUCE: (20), (31) imply: % 11.42/2.30 | | | | (32) $false % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | | CLOSE: (32) is inconsistent. % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | Case 2: % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | | (33) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : (subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = v1 & % 11.42/2.30 | | | | subset(all_40_2, all_40_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ~ (v0 = 0))) % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | | DELTA: instantiating (33) with fresh symbols all_110_0, all_110_1 gives: % 11.42/2.30 | | | | (34) subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = all_110_0 & subset(all_40_2, % 11.42/2.30 | | | | all_40_2) = all_110_1 & ( ~ (all_110_0 = 0) | ~ (all_110_1 = % 11.42/2.30 | | | | 0)) % 11.42/2.30 | | | | % 11.42/2.30 | | | | ALPHA: (34) implies: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | (35) subset(all_40_2, all_40_2) = all_110_1 % 11.42/2.31 | | | | (36) subset(all_40_2, all_40_1) = all_110_0 % 11.42/2.31 | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_105_0, all_110_1, all_40_2, % 11.42/2.31 | | | | all_40_2, simplifying with (28), (35) gives: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | (37) all_110_1 = all_105_0 % 11.42/2.31 | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_110_0, all_40_1, all_40_2, % 11.42/2.31 | | | | simplifying with (10), (36) gives: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | (38) all_110_0 = 0 % 11.42/2.31 | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_105_1, all_110_0, all_40_1, % 11.42/2.31 | | | | all_40_2, simplifying with (29), (36) gives: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | (39) all_110_0 = all_105_1 % 11.42/2.31 | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (38), (39) imply: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | (40) all_105_1 = 0 % 11.42/2.31 | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | BETA: splitting (30) gives: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | Case 1: % 11.42/2.31 | | | | | % 11.42/2.31 | | | | | (41) ~ (all_105_0 = 0) % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_40_2, all_105_0, simplifying % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | with (7), (28) gives: % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | (42) all_105_0 = 0 % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | REDUCE: (41), (42) imply: % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | (43) $false % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | CLOSE: (43) is inconsistent. % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | Case 2: % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | (44) ~ (all_105_1 = 0) % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | REDUCE: (40), (44) imply: % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | (45) $false % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | CLOSE: (45) is inconsistent. % 11.64/2.31 | | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | | End of split % 11.64/2.31 | | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | | End of split % 11.64/2.31 | | | % 11.64/2.31 | | End of split % 11.64/2.31 | | % 11.64/2.31 | End of split % 11.64/2.31 | % 11.64/2.31 End of proof % 11.64/2.31 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 11.64/2.31 % 11.64/2.31 1720ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------