↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU131+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:54 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.66s 0.69s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  185 (  36 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  204 (  85   ~;  73   |;  32   &)
%                                         (  10 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  170 (  19 sgn  80   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( ~ in(X4,X2)
            & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(t4_xboole_0,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ~ ( ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
          & ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).

fof(t3_xboole_0,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
              & in(X3,X1) ) )
      & ~ ( ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X2)
                & in(X3,X1) )
          & ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_0) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t28_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t28_xboole_1) ).

fof(t1_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X2,X3)
        & subset(X1,X2) )
     => subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).

fof(t17_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_xboole_1) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
        <=> in(X3,X2) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).

fof(l32_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l32_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( ~ in(X4,X2)
            & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_12,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ~ ( ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
          & ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t4_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ( X48 = set_difference(X46,X47)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | ~ in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X47) )
      & ( X48 = set_difference(X46,X47)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X46) )
      & ( X48 = set_difference(X46,X47)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X47)
        | ~ in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X46)
        | ~ in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X48) )
      & ( X43 != set_difference(X41,X42)
        | in(X45,X43)
        | in(X45,X42)
        | ~ in(X45,X41) )
      & ( X43 != set_difference(X41,X42)
        | ~ in(X44,X43)
        | ~ in(X44,X42) )
      & ( X43 != set_difference(X41,X42)
        | ~ in(X44,X43)
        | in(X44,X41) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
              & in(X3,X1) ) )
      & ~ ( ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X2)
                & in(X3,X1) )
          & ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_15,lemma,
    ! [X95,X96,X98,X99,X100] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X98,X99)
        | ~ in(X100,set_intersection2(X98,X99)) )
      & ( in(esk12_2(X95,X96),set_intersection2(X95,X96))
        | disjoint(X95,X96) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : set_intersection2(X9,X10) = set_intersection2(X10,X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X3 != set_difference(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,lemma,
    ! [X87,X88,X90,X91,X92] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X90,X91)
        | ~ in(X92,X91)
        | ~ in(X92,X90) )
      & ( disjoint(X87,X88)
        | in(esk11_2(X87,X88),X88) )
      & ( disjoint(X87,X88)
        | in(esk11_2(X87,X88),X87) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( X3 != set_difference(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X26,X27,X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ( subset(X29,X30)
        | ~ in(esk3_2(X29,X30),X30) )
      & ( subset(X29,X30)
        | in(esk3_2(X29,X30),X29) )
      & ( in(X28,X27)
        | ~ in(X28,X26)
        | ~ subset(X26,X27) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
    ( ~ disjoint(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_23,lemma,
    ! [X79,X80] :
      ( set_intersection2(X79,X80) = X79
      | ~ subset(X79,X80) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t28_xboole_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_26,lemma,
    ! [X73,X74,X75] :
      ( subset(X73,X75)
      | ~ subset(X74,X75)
      | ~ subset(X73,X74) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,lemma,
    ! [X67,X68] : subset(set_intersection2(X67,X68),X67),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t17_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X2,X1))
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,lemma,
    ( ~ in(esk11_2(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)),X3)
    | disjoint(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
    subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(set_difference(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
    disjoint(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

fof(c_0_43,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ( X15 = empty_set
        | in(esk1_1(X15),X15) )
      & ( ~ in(X14,X13)
        | X13 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X3,set_difference(X1,X2))
    | ~ subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,lemma,
    subset(set_difference(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X1)
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).

fof(c_0_47,plain,
    ! [X82,X83] :
      ( ( X82 = X83
        | in(esk10_2(X82,X83),X83)
        | in(esk10_2(X82,X83),X82) )
      & ( X82 = X83
        | ~ in(esk10_2(X82,X83),X83)
        | ~ in(esk10_2(X82,X83),X82) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_tarski])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
      <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l32_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,lemma,
    ~ in(X1,set_difference(set_intersection2(X2,X3),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | in(esk10_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | in(esk10_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

fof(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( subset(esk6_0,esk7_0)
      | set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0) = empty_set )
    & ( ~ subset(esk6_0,esk7_0)
      | set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_48])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X3,set_difference(X1,X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( in(esk10_2(empty_set,X1),X1)
    | empty_set = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( X4 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X4)
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk6_0,esk7_0)
    | set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk6_0,esk7_0)
    | set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk6_0,esk7_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),set_difference(X1,X3))
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(esk6_0,esk7_0) = empty_set,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk3_2(esk6_0,X1),esk7_0)
    | subset(esk6_0,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_64]),c_0_61]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU131+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:54:37 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.66/0.69  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.66/0.69  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.66/0.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1505172 completed with status 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.66/0.69  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.66/0.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.66/0.69  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.66/0.69  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 1.66/0.69  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with 136s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1505179 completed with status 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.66/0.69  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.66/0.69  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.66/0.69  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.66/0.69  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 1.66/0.69  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 1.66/0.69  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 1.66/0.69  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.66/0.69  
% 1.66/0.69  % Proof found!
% 1.66/0.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.66/0.69  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.66/0.69  % Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 1.66/0.69  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Initial clauses                      : 70
% 1.66/0.69  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 1.66/0.69  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 66
% 1.66/0.69  % Processed clauses                    : 1970
% 1.66/0.69  % ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 1.66/0.69  % ...subsumed                          : 1503
% 1.66/0.69  % ...remaining for further processing  : 454
% 1.66/0.69  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 29
% 1.66/0.69  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 1.66/0.69  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 1.66/0.69  % Generated clauses                    : 7387
% 1.66/0.69  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6663
% 1.66/0.69  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 1.66/0.69  % Paramodulations                      : 7278
% 1.66/0.69  % Factorizations                       : 78
% 1.66/0.69  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Equation resolutions                 : 29
% 1.66/0.69  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1351
% 1.66/0.69  % ...of those cached                   : 1233
% 1.66/0.69  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.66/0.69  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.66/0.69  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.66/0.69  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.66/0.69  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.66/0.69  % Current number of processed clauses  : 367
% 1.66/0.69  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 31
% 1.66/0.69  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 1.66/0.69  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 1.66/0.69  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 328
% 1.66/0.69  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4784
% 1.66/0.69  % ...number of literals in the above   : 15529
% 1.66/0.69  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Current number of archived clauses   : 75
% 1.66/0.69  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31848
% 1.66/0.69  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20974
% 1.66/0.69  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1201
% 1.66/0.69  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 944
% 1.66/0.69  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 62
% 1.66/0.69  % BW rewrite match successes           : 33
% 1.66/0.69  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.66/0.69  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 78786
% 1.66/0.69  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1027
% 1.66/0.69  
% 1.66/0.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.66/0.69  % User time                : 0.229 s
% 1.66/0.69  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 1.66/0.69  % Total time               : 0.243 s
% 1.66/0.69  % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 1.66/0.69  
% 1.66/0.69  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.66/0.69  % User time                : 0.894 s
% 1.66/0.69  % System time              : 0.061 s
% 1.66/0.69  % Total time               : 0.955 s
% 1.66/0.69  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 1.66/0.69  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------