%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU133+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:12 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 220.66s 220.88s % Output : Refutation 220.66s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU133+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:28:14 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 220.66/220.88 % 220.66/220.88 SPASS V 3.9 % 220.66/220.88 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 220.66/220.88 % SZS status Theorem % 220.66/220.88 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 220.66/220.88 SPASS derived 111411 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 23023 clauses. % 220.66/220.88 SPASS allocated 172785 KBytes. % 220.66/220.88 SPASS spent 0:3:33.85 on the problem. % 220.66/220.88 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 220.66/220.88 0:00:00.07 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 220.66/220.88 0:00:01.25 for inferences. % 220.66/220.88 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 220.66/220.88 0:3:31.59 for the reduction. % 220.66/220.88 % 220.66/220.88 % 220.66/220.88 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 9 : % 220.66/220.88 % SZS output start Refutation % 220.66/220.88 14[0:Inp] || subset(set_difference(skc5,skc4),skc5)*l -> . % 220.66/220.88 28[0:Inp] || -> subset(u,v) in(skf10(v,u),u)*. % 220.66/220.88 31[0:Inp] || in(skf10(u,v),u)*+ -> subset(w,u)*. % 220.66/220.88 51[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,set_difference(w,x))*+ -> in(u,w)*. % 220.66/220.88 72[0:Res:31.1,14.0] || in(skf10(skc5,u),skc5)* -> . % 220.66/220.88 382[0:EqR:51.1] || in(u,set_difference(v,w))* -> in(u,v). % 220.66/220.88 392[0:Res:28.1,382.0] || -> subset(set_difference(u,v),w) in(skf10(w,set_difference(u,v)),u)*. % 220.66/220.88 140152[0:Res:392.1,72.0] || -> subset(set_difference(skc5,u),skc5)*l. % 220.66/220.88 140205[0:UnC:140152.0,14.0] || -> . % 220.66/220.88 % SZS output end Refutation % 220.66/220.88 Formulae used in the proof : t36_xboole_1 d3_tarski d4_xboole_0 % 220.66/220.88 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------