↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  14   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   6   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l32_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set
    <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l32_xboole_1) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set
    <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set
      <=> subset(A,B) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t37_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) != empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l32_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_25,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) = empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l32_xboole_1]) ).

fof(nnf_13,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( ( ~ subset(A,B)
        | set_difference(A,B) != empty_set )
      & ( subset(A,B)
        | set_difference(A,B) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t37_xboole_1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ subset(sK0,sK1)
      | set_difference(sK0,sK1) != empty_set )
    & ( subset(sK0,sK1)
      | set_difference(sK0,sK1) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_13]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(sK0,sK1)
    | set_difference(sK0,sK1) = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t37_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK0,sK1)
    | set_difference(sK0,sK1) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t37_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(sK0,sK1) = empty_set
    | set_difference(sK0,sK1) = empty_set ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_36,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(sK0,sK1) = empty_set,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_39]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK0,sK1)
    | empty_set != empty_set ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_27]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_40]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(sK0,sK1) != empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set != empty_set,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_42]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SEU134+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:43:29 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.17/0.44  % Process 450497 was started by sandbox2 on n016,
% 0.17/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 08:43:29 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.17/0.45  
% 0.17/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.17/0.46  % Length of proof is 9.
% 0.17/0.46  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.17/0.46  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.17/0.46  % Given clauses 16.
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------