↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU134+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:52:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   4 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  29   ~;  30   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  12   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f20,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l32_xboole_1) ).

fof(f37,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(f38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set
      <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f37]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set
    <~> subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( subset(X0,X1)
        | empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1) )
      & ( subset(X0,X1)
        | set_difference(X0,X1) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ( ( ~ subset(sK8,sK9)
      | empty_set != set_difference(sK8,sK9) )
    & ( subset(sK8,sK9)
      | empty_set = set_difference(sK8,sK9) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK8,sK9]),skolemize(X0,sK8),skolemize(X1,sK9)],[f103]) ).

fof(f143,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f144,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | empty_set = set_difference(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f98]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ( subset(sK8,sK9)
    | empty_set = set_difference(sK8,sK9) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK8,sK9)
    | empty_set != set_difference(sK8,sK9) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f190,definition,
    ( spl12_1
  <=> empty_set = set_difference(sK8,sK9) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl12_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    ( empty_set != set_difference(sK8,sK9)
    | spl12_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f190]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    ( empty_set = set_difference(sK8,sK9)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f190]) ).

fof(f194,definition,
    ( spl12_2
  <=> subset(sK8,sK9) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl12_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK8,sK9)
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f194]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ( subset(sK8,sK9)
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f194]) ).

fof(f197,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f162,f194,f190]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ( ~ spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f163,f194,f190]) ).

fof(f263,plain,
    ( empty_set = set_difference(sK8,sK9)
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f144,f196]) ).

fof(f264,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f263,f191]) ).

fof(f265,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f264]) ).

fof(f266,plain,
    ( empty_set != empty_set
    | subset(sK8,sK9)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f143,f192]) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    ( subset(sK8,sK9)
    | ~ spl12_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f266]) ).

fof(f269,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f268,f195]) ).

fof(f270,plain,
    ( ~ spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f269]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f197]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f198]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl12_1
    | ~ spl12_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f265]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl12_1
    | spl12_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f270]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    spl12_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s3]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl12_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s5]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s6,s5]) ).

fof(f271,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU134+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:40:49 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.13/0.43  Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  % (3639088)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.18/0.47  % (3639097)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=4294538916:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (3639097) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3639088-3639097"...
% 0.18/0.47  % (3639095)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.18/0.47  % (3639097)...printing done.
% 0.18/0.47  % (3639097)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639097)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.18/0.48  % (3639088)Success in time 0.033 s
% 0.18/0.48  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------