↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU135+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:23:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.10s 1.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  142 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  157 (  63   ~;  64   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  112 (   8 sgn  68   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t39_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_xboole_1) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X2,X1)
        & subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(t8_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X3,X2)
        & subset(X1,X2) )
     => subset(set_union2(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(t1_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X2,X3)
        & subset(X1,X2) )
     => subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).

fof(t36_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X2)
            | in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( ~ in(X4,X2)
            & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t39_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)) != set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( ( X11 = X12
        | ~ subset(X12,X11)
        | ~ subset(X11,X12) )
      & ( X11 != X12
        | subset(X12,X11) )
      & ( X11 != X12
        | subset(X11,X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)) != set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,lemma,
    ! [X117,X118,X119] :
      ( subset(set_union2(X117,X119),X118)
      | ~ subset(X119,X118)
      | ~ subset(X117,X118) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_xboole_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,lemma,
    ! [X113,X114] : subset(X113,set_union2(X113,X114)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0),set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)))
    | ~ subset(set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)),set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | subset(set_union2(X1,X3),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_20,lemma,
    ! [X73,X74,X75] :
      ( subset(X73,X75)
      | ~ subset(X74,X75)
      | ~ subset(X73,X74) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,lemma,
    ! [X89,X90] : subset(set_difference(X89,X90),X89),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t36_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] : set_union2(X7,X8) = set_union2(X8,X7),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0),set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0))
    | ~ subset(set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0),set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(esk10_0,set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)))
    | ~ subset(set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0),set_union2(esk9_0,esk10_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X26,X27,X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ( subset(X29,X30)
        | ~ in(esk3_2(X29,X30),X30) )
      & ( subset(X29,X30)
        | in(esk3_2(X29,X30),X29) )
      & ( in(X28,X27)
        | ~ in(X28,X26)
        | ~ subset(X26,X27) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X24] :
      ( ( X24 = set_union2(X22,X23)
        | in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X23)
        | in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X22)
        | in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X24) )
      & ( X24 = set_union2(X22,X23)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X24)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X23) )
      & ( X24 = set_union2(X22,X23)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X24)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X22,X23,X24),X22) )
      & ( X19 != set_union2(X17,X18)
        | in(X21,X19)
        | ~ in(X21,X18) )
      & ( X19 != set_union2(X17,X18)
        | in(X21,X19)
        | ~ in(X21,X17) )
      & ( X19 != set_union2(X17,X18)
        | in(X20,X18)
        | in(X20,X17)
        | ~ in(X20,X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( ~ in(X4,X2)
            & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ~ subset(esk10_0,set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( X3 != set_union2(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48] :
      ( ( X48 = set_difference(X46,X47)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | ~ in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X47) )
      & ( X48 = set_difference(X46,X47)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X48)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X46) )
      & ( X48 = set_difference(X46,X47)
        | in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X47)
        | ~ in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X46)
        | ~ in(esk5_3(X46,X47,X48),X48) )
      & ( X43 != set_difference(X41,X42)
        | in(X45,X43)
        | in(X45,X42)
        | ~ in(X45,X41) )
      & ( X43 != set_difference(X41,X42)
        | ~ in(X44,X43)
        | ~ in(X44,X42) )
      & ( X43 != set_difference(X41,X42)
        | ~ in(X44,X43)
        | in(X44,X41) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( X3 != set_union2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,lemma,
    ~ in(esk3_2(esk10_0,set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))),set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( X4 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X4)
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
    ~ in(esk3_2(esk10_0,set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))),set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,lemma,
    in(esk3_2(esk10_0,set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))),esk10_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,lemma,
    ~ in(esk3_2(esk10_0,set_union2(esk9_0,set_difference(esk10_0,esk9_0))),esk9_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,lemma,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45])]),c_0_46]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU135+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:53:02 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.10/1.32  % Version: 3.5.1
% 6.10/1.32  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.10/1.32  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2144869 completed with status 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.10/1.32  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.10/1.32  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.10/1.32  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.10/1.32  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 6.10/1.32  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 164s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S022A with 136s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S022A with pid 2144880 completed with status 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Result found by G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S022A
% 6.10/1.32  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.10/1.32  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.10/1.32  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.10/1.32  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 6.10/1.32  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 164s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Starting G-E--_208_C12_02_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S022A with 136s (1) cores
% 6.10/1.32  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 6.10/1.32  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.10/1.32  
% 6.10/1.32  % Proof found!
% 6.10/1.32  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.10/1.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.10/1.32  % Parsed axioms                        : 48
% 6.10/1.32  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Initial clauses                      : 75
% 6.10/1.32  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 6.10/1.32  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 71
% 6.10/1.32  % Processed clauses                    : 9201
% 6.10/1.32  % ...of these trivial                  : 186
% 6.10/1.32  % ...subsumed                          : 8174
% 6.10/1.32  % ...remaining for further processing  : 841
% 6.10/1.32  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1660
% 6.10/1.32  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Backward-subsumed                    : 77
% 6.10/1.32  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 6.10/1.32  % Generated clauses                    : 114667
% 6.10/1.32  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 103358
% 6.10/1.32  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 6.10/1.32  % Paramodulations                      : 113002
% 6.10/1.32  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Equation resolutions                 : 1665
% 6.10/1.32  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Total rewrite steps                  : 45111
% 6.10/1.32  % ...of those cached                   : 44889
% 6.10/1.32  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.10/1.32  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.10/1.32  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.10/1.32  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.10/1.32  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.10/1.32  % Current number of processed clauses  : 680
% 6.10/1.32  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 66
% 6.10/1.32  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 6.10/1.32  %    Negative unit clauses             : 166
% 6.10/1.32  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 446
% 6.10/1.32  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 93076
% 6.10/1.32  % ...number of literals in the above   : 365778
% 6.10/1.32  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Current number of archived clauses   : 149
% 6.10/1.32  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 86563
% 6.10/1.32  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44117
% 6.10/1.32  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2551
% 6.10/1.32  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5754
% 6.10/1.32  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 55
% 6.10/1.32  % BW rewrite match successes           : 33
% 6.10/1.32  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.10/1.32  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1447717
% 6.10/1.32  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1052
% 6.10/1.32  
% 6.10/1.32  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.10/1.32  % User time                : 0.837 s
% 6.10/1.32  % System time              : 0.033 s
% 6.10/1.32  % Total time               : 0.870 s
% 6.10/1.32  % Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 6.10/1.32  
% 6.10/1.32  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.10/1.32  % User time                : 4.150 s
% 6.10/1.32  % System time              : 0.184 s
% 6.10/1.32  % Total time               : 4.334 s
% 6.10/1.32  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 6.10/1.32  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------