↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU139+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  14   ~;   6   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn   8   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( A = B
    <=> ( subset(B,A)
        & subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(d8_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( proper_subset(A,B)
    <=> ( A != B
        & subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d8_xboole_0) ).

fof(t60_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ~ ( proper_subset(B,A)
        & subset(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t60_xboole_1) ).

fof(t60_xboole_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ~ ( proper_subset(B,A)
          & subset(A,B) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t60_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ subset(B,A)
    | A = B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | ~ proper_subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d8_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( B != A
    | ~ proper_subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d8_xboole_0]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( proper_subset(B,A)
      & subset(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t60_xboole_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t60_xboole_1_neg,plain,
    ( proper_subset(sK1,sK0)
    & subset(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_6]) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t60_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_17,negated_conjecture,
    proper_subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t60_xboole_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK1,sK0)
    | sK0 = sK1 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(sK1,sK0)
    | sK1 = sK0 ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_24]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_25]) ).

cnf(c_21,plain,
    subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU139+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:40:54 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.37  % Process 2468167 was started by sandbox on n003,
% 0.11/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:40:54 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.38  
% 0.15/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.15/0.39  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.15/0.39  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.15/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.15/0.39  % Given clauses 11.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------