↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU139+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEU139+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 01:23:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.48  SPASS derived 17 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 82 clauses.
% 0.18/0.48  SPASS allocated 98598 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.15 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.48  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.48  		0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 0.18/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.48  3[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc4,skc5)*r.
% 0.18/0.48  4[0:Inp] ||  -> proper_subset(skc5,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.48  32[0:Inp] || proper_subset(u,v)* proper_subset(v,u)* -> .
% 0.18/0.48  35[0:Inp] || proper_subset(u,v)* equal(u,v) -> .
% 0.18/0.48  50[0:Inp] || subset(u,v) -> proper_subset(u,v)* equal(u,v).
% 0.18/0.48  85[0:Res:4.0,32.0] || proper_subset(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.18/0.48  86[0:Res:4.0,35.1] || equal(skc5,skc4)** -> .
% 0.18/0.48  95[0:Res:3.0,50.0] ||  -> equal(skc5,skc4) proper_subset(skc4,skc5)*.
% 0.18/0.48  101[0:MRR:95.0,95.1,86.0,85.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : t60_xboole_1 antisymmetry_r2_xboole_0 d8_xboole_0
% 0.18/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------