↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU140+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.12s 1.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  15   ~;  10   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t63_xboole_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & disjoint(X2,X3) )
     => disjoint(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t63_xboole_1) ).

fof(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(t26_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => subset(set_intersection2(X1,X3),set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_xboole_1) ).

fof(t3_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( subset(X1,empty_set)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & disjoint(X2,X3) )
       => disjoint(X1,X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t63_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X35,X36)
        | set_intersection2(X35,X36) = empty_set )
      & ( set_intersection2(X35,X36) != empty_set
        | disjoint(X35,X36) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d7_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & disjoint(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & ~ disjoint(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X43,X44,X45] :
      ( ~ subset(X43,X44)
      | subset(set_intersection2(X43,X45),set_intersection2(X44,X45)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t26_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X47] :
      ( ~ subset(X47,empty_set)
      | X47 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subset(set_intersection2(X1,X3),set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk4_0,esk5_0) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X1,X2) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X33,X34] : set_intersection2(X33,X34) = set_intersection2(X34,X33),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(set_intersection2(X1,esk5_0),empty_set)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk3_0,esk5_0) != empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,esk5_0) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk3_0) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_20]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SEU140+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.07/0.29  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.29  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 21:44:26 EDT 2026
% 0.07/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.07/0.30  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.12/1.66  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.12/1.66  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.66  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.12/1.66  % Total time : 1.361s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------