%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU140+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UuSRLiOKtc true
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:53:32 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Theorem 0.57s 0.83s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 7 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 88 ( 9 ~; 6 |; 2 &; 66 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 ^; 22 !; 0 ?; 22 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(disjoint_type,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(set_intersection2_type,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__3_type,type,
sk__3: $i ).
thf(sk__4_type,type,
sk__4: $i ).
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(empty_set_type,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(t63_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( subset @ A @ B )
& ( disjoint @ B @ C ) )
=> ( disjoint @ A @ C ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( subset @ A @ B )
& ( disjoint @ B @ C ) )
=> ( disjoint @ A @ C ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t63_xboole_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl17,plain,
subset @ sk__2 @ sk__3,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl16,plain,
disjoint @ sk__3 @ sk__4,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
<=> ( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B )
= empty_set ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X1 )
= empty_set )
| ~ ( disjoint @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d7_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl71,plain,
( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__3 @ sk__4 )
= empty_set ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl16,zip_derived_cl2]) ).
thf(t26_xboole_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ B )
=> ( subset @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ C ) @ ( set_intersection2 @ B @ C ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( subset @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( subset @ ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( set_intersection2 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t26_xboole_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl96,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( subset @ X0 @ sk__3 )
| ( subset @ ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ sk__4 ) @ empty_set ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl71,zip_derived_cl12]) ).
thf(t3_xboole_1,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( subset @ A @ empty_set )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = empty_set )
| ~ ( subset @ X0 @ empty_set ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t3_xboole_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl150,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( subset @ X0 @ sk__3 )
| ( ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ sk__4 )
= empty_set ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl96,zip_derived_cl14]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl224,plain,
( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
= empty_set ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl17,zip_derived_cl150]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X1 )
!= empty_set ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d7_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
~ ( disjoint @ sk__2 @ sk__4 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl69,plain,
( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
!= empty_set ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl15]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl228,plain,
$false,
inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl224,zip_derived_cl69]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SEU140+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UuSRLiOKtc true
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:03:23 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.57/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.79 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.83 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.57/0.83 % BCE start: 21
% 0.57/0.83 % BCE eliminated: 2
% 0.57/0.83 % PE start: 19
% 0.57/0.83 logic: eq
% 0.57/0.83 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.57/0.83 % done 69 iterations in 0.054s
% 0.57/0.83 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.57/0.83 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.83
% 0.57/0.83
% 0.57/0.83 % Terminating...
% 1.64/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.64/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------