%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU140+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:16 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s % Output : Refutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU140+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:53:17 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.50 % 0.19/0.50 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.19/0.50 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.19/0.50 % SZS status Theorem % 0.19/0.50 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.50 SPASS derived 184 clauses, backtracked 49 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 208 clauses. % 0.19/0.50 SPASS allocated 98592 KBytes. % 0.19/0.50 SPASS spent 0:00:00.14 on the problem. % 0.19/0.50 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.19/0.50 0:00:00.08 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.19/0.50 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.19/0.50 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.19/0.50 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.19/0.50 % 0.19/0.50 % 0.19/0.50 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 14 : % 0.19/0.50 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.19/0.50 3[0:Inp] || -> subset(skc7,skc5)*l. % 0.19/0.50 4[0:Inp] || -> disjoint(skc5,skc6)*. % 0.19/0.50 8[0:Inp] || disjoint(skc7,skc6)* -> . % 0.19/0.50 37[0:Inp] || -> disjoint(u,v) in(skf14(v,u),u)*. % 0.19/0.50 38[0:Inp] || -> disjoint(u,v)* in(skf14(v,w),v)*. % 0.19/0.50 56[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> in(u,w)*. % 0.19/0.50 61[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v)* in(w,v)* in(w,u)* -> . % 0.19/0.50 88[0:Res:4.0,61.2] || in(u,skc6)* in(u,skc5) -> . % 0.19/0.50 92[0:Res:37.1,8.0] || -> in(skf14(skc6,skc7),skc7)*. % 0.19/0.50 94[0:Res:38.1,8.0] || -> in(skf14(skc6,u),skc6)*. % 0.19/0.50 101[0:Res:3.0,56.0] || in(u,skc7)* -> in(u,skc5). % 0.19/0.50 196[0:Res:92.0,101.0] || -> in(skf14(skc6,skc7),skc5)*. % 0.19/0.50 297[0:Res:94.0,88.0] || in(skf14(skc6,u),skc5)* -> . % 0.19/0.50 299[0:UnC:297.0,196.0] || -> . % 0.19/0.50 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.19/0.50 Formulae used in the proof : t63_xboole_1 t3_xboole_0 d3_tarski antisymmetry_r2_hidden % 0.19/0.50 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------