↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SEU143+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:58:11 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.41s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   96 (  58 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  45   ~;  39   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   1 sgn  41   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( A = empty_set
    <=> ! [B] : ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(l1_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] : singleton(A) != empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',l1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f_2_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( B = singleton(A)
        | ? [C] :
            ( ( ~ in(C,B)
              & C = A )
            | ( C != A
              & in(C,B) ) ) )
      & ( ! [C] :
            ( ( in(C,B)
              | C != A )
            & ( C = A
              | ~ in(C,B) ) )
        | B != singleton(A) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

fof(f_2_2,plain,
    ! [U_5,U_4] :
      ( ( U_4 = singleton(U_5)
        | ? [U_3] :
            ( ( ~ in(U_3,U_4)
              & U_3 = U_5 )
            | ( U_3 != U_5
              & in(U_3,U_4) ) ) )
      & ( ! [U_2] :
            ( ( in(U_2,U_4)
              | U_2 != U_5 )
            & ( U_2 = U_5
              | ~ in(U_2,U_4) ) )
        | U_4 != singleton(U_5) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_2_1]) ).

fof(f_2_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_13,U_11] :
        ( U_11 = singleton(U_13)
        | ? [U_9] :
            ( ~ in(U_9,U_11)
            & U_9 = U_13 )
        | ? [U_8] :
            ( U_8 != U_13
            & in(U_8,U_11) ) )
    & ! [U_12,U_10] :
        ( ( ! [U_7] :
              ( in(U_7,U_10)
              | U_7 != U_12 )
          & ! [U_6] :
              ( U_6 = U_12
              | ~ in(U_6,U_10) ) )
        | U_10 != singleton(U_12) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_2_2]) ).

fof(f_2_4,plain,
    ( ! [U_13,U_11] :
        ( U_11 = singleton(U_13)
        | ? [U_9] :
            ( ~ in(U_9,U_11)
            & U_9 = U_13 )
        | ( sK1(U_13,U_11) != U_13
          & in(sK1(U_13,U_11),U_11) ) )
    & ! [U_12,U_10] :
        ( ( ! [U_7] :
              ( in(U_7,U_10)
              | U_7 != U_12 )
          & ! [U_6] :
              ( U_6 = U_12
              | ~ in(U_6,U_10) ) )
        | U_10 != singleton(U_12) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_8,sK1(U_13,U_11))],[f_2_3]) ).

fof(f_2_5,plain,
    ( ! [U_13,U_11] :
        ( U_11 = singleton(U_13)
        | ( ~ in(sK2(U_13,U_11),U_11)
          & sK2(U_13,U_11) = U_13 )
        | ( sK1(U_13,U_11) != U_13
          & in(sK1(U_13,U_11),U_11) ) )
    & ! [U_12,U_10] :
        ( ( ! [U_7] :
              ( in(U_7,U_10)
              | U_7 != U_12 )
          & ! [U_6] :
              ( U_6 = U_12
              | ~ in(U_6,U_10) ) )
        | U_10 != singleton(U_12) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_9,sK2(U_13,U_11))],[f_2_4]) ).

cnf(f_2_7,plain,
    ( in(U_7,U_10)
    | U_7 != U_12
    | U_10 != singleton(U_12) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_2_5]) ).

fof(f_3_1,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( A = empty_set
        | ? [B] : in(B,A) )
      & ( ! [B] : ~ in(B,A)
        | A != empty_set ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(f_3_2,plain,
    ! [U_16] :
      ( ( U_16 = empty_set
        | ? [U_15] : in(U_15,U_16) )
      & ( ! [U_14] : ~ in(U_14,U_16)
        | U_16 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_3_1]) ).

fof(f_3_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_18] :
        ( U_18 = empty_set
        | ? [U_15] : in(U_15,U_18) )
    & ! [U_17] :
        ( ! [U_14] : ~ in(U_14,U_17)
        | U_17 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_3_2]) ).

fof(f_3_4,plain,
    ( ! [U_18] :
        ( U_18 = empty_set
        | in(sK3(U_18),U_18) )
    & ! [U_17] :
        ( ! [U_14] : ~ in(U_14,U_17)
        | U_17 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_15,sK3(U_18))],[f_3_3]) ).

cnf(f_3_5,plain,
    ( ~ in(U_14,U_17)
    | U_17 != empty_set ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_3_4]) ).

fof(f_7_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : singleton(A) != empty_set,
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[l1_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_7_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A] : singleton(A) = empty_set,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_7_1]) ).

fof(f_7_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_19] : singleton(U_19) = empty_set,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_7_2]) ).

fof(f_7_4,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK4) = empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(U_19,sK4)],[f_7_3]) ).

fof(f_7_5,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK4) = empty_set,
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_7_4]) ).

cnf(f_7_6,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK4) = empty_set,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_7_5]) ).

cnf(equality_1,axiom,
    Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_0,
    theory(equality,[reflexivity]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK4,singleton(sK4))
    | singleton(sK4) != empty_set ),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_3_5]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    singleton(sK4) = empty_set,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_7_6]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( sK4 != sK4
    | singleton(sK4) != singleton(sK4)
    | in(sK4,singleton(sK4)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:2)],[f_2_7]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t1:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    singleton(sK4) = singleton(sK4),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    sK4 = sK4,
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[equality_1]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU143+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 23:22:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.41  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------