↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU143+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  15   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   6 sgn  11   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = singleton(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> C = A ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( A = empty_set
    <=> ! [B] : ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t28_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
     => set_intersection2(A,B) = A ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t28_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(l1_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] : singleton(A) != empty_set,
    file('theBenchmark.p',l1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l1_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] : singleton(A) != empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l1_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( C != A
    | in(C,B)
    | singleton(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( ~ in(B,A)
    | empty_set != A ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_128,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(A,B) = A
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t28_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_153,plain,
    subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

fof(nnf_63,plain,
    ? [A] : singleton(A) = empty_set,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l1_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_l1_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    singleton(sK0) = empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(A,sK0)],[nnf_63]) ).

cnf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK0) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l1_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
    empty_set = singleton(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_158]) ).

cnf(c_196,plain,
    ~ in(A,empty_set),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

cnf(c_1007,plain,
    set_intersection2(A,set_union2(A,B)) = A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_128]) ).

cnf(c_1047,plain,
    ( C != A
    | in(C,B)
    | B != singleton(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

cnf(c_1048,negated_conjecture,
    ( A != sK0
    | in(A,empty_set) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_159,c_1047]) ).

cnf(c_1049,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 != A
    | in(A,empty_set) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1048]) ).

cnf(c_1045,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != A,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_1049]) ).

cnf(c_1050,plain,
    A = set_intersection2(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_1007]) ).

cnf(c_1046,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1045,c_1050]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU143+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:40:26 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 3234810 was started by sandbox on n008,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:40:26 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.49  
% 0.09/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.49  
% 0.09/0.49  % Proof 1 at 0.07 (+ 0.03) seconds.
% 0.09/0.49  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.09/0.49  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.09/0.49  % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 0.09/0.49  % Given clauses 94.
% 0.09/0.49  
% 0.09/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------