↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU144+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   66 (  25   ~;  29   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  21   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l2_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    <=> in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
      <=> in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l2_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X25,X26)
        | ~ in(X27,X25)
        | in(X27,X26) )
      & ( in(esk2_2(X28,X29),X28)
        | subset(X28,X29) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_2(X28,X29),X29)
        | subset(X28,X29) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ subset(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0)
      | ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0) )
    & ( subset(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0)
      | in(esk3_0,esk4_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X18,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23] :
      ( ( ~ in(X20,X19)
        | X20 = X18
        | X19 != singleton(X18) )
      & ( X21 != X18
        | in(X21,X19)
        | X19 != singleton(X18) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X22,X23),X23)
        | esk1_2(X22,X23) != X22
        | X23 = singleton(X22) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X22,X23),X23)
        | esk1_2(X22,X23) = X22
        | X23 = singleton(X22) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0)
    | in(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | in(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0)
    | ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( esk2_2(singleton(X1),X2) = X1
    | subset(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(singleton(esk3_0),esk4_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU144+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:45:55 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------