↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU145+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.36s 27.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  111 (  60 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  227 (  68 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  195 (  79   ~;  86   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  220 (  23 sgn 110   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l3_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => ( in(X3,X1)
        | subset(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l3_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t1_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X3) )
     => subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_xboole_1) ).

fof(t33_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => subset(set_difference(X1,X3),set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t33_xboole_1) ).

fof(t40_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_difference(set_union2(X1,X2),X2) = set_difference(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t40_xboole_1) ).

fof(t39_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t39_xboole_1) ).

fof(t26_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => subset(set_intersection2(X1,X3),set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t26_xboole_1) ).

fof(t48_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_intersection2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(l32_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l32_xboole_1) ).

fof(t2_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : set_intersection2(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t2_boole) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t3_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : set_difference(X1,empty_set) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_boole) ).

fof(l2_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    <=> in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            | in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t1_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : set_union2(X1,empty_set) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_boole) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t28_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t28_xboole_1) ).

fof(t36_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(t8_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X2) )
     => subset(set_union2(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t8_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(X1,X2)
       => ( in(X3,X1)
          | subset(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l3_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_23,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | ~ subset(X5,X6)
      | subset(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | subset(set_difference(X4,X6),set_difference(X5,X6)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t33_xboole_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] : set_difference(set_union2(X3,X4),X4) = set_difference(X3,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t40_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_26,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] : set_union2(X3,set_difference(X4,X3)) = set_union2(X3,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t39_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_27,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | subset(set_intersection2(X4,X6),set_intersection2(X5,X6)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t26_xboole_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] : set_difference(X3,set_difference(X3,X4)) = set_intersection2(X3,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_29,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( set_difference(X3,X4) != empty_set
        | subset(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
        | set_difference(X3,X4) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l32_xboole_1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & ~ in(esk3_0,esk1_0)
    & ~ subset(esk1_0,set_difference(esk2_0,singleton(esk3_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X2] : set_intersection2(X2,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_boole]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : set_intersection2(X3,X4) = set_intersection2(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
    ( subset(set_difference(X1,X2),set_difference(X3,X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
    set_difference(set_union2(X1,X2),X2) = set_difference(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
    set_union2(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_union2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
    ( subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),set_intersection2(X3,X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,lemma,
    set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_intersection2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
    ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X2] : set_difference(X2,empty_set) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t3_boole]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

fof(c_0_44,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ subset(singleton(X3),X4)
        | in(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ in(X3,X4)
        | subset(singleton(X3),X4) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l2_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ subset(X1,set_difference(X4,X3))
    | ~ subset(X4,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,lemma,
    set_difference(set_union2(X1,X2),set_difference(X2,X1)) = set_difference(X1,set_difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,lemma,
    ( subset(set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)),set_difference(X3,set_difference(X3,X2)))
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    set_difference(X1,empty_set) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,empty_set)) = empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_38]) ).

fof(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X3] : set_union2(X3,X3) = X3,
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | set_difference(X1,X2) != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_38]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,lemma,
    ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(X2,set_difference(X3,X4)))
    | ~ subset(X1,set_difference(X4,set_difference(X3,X4)))
    | ~ subset(set_union2(X4,X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,lemma,
    ( subset(esk1_0,set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,esk2_0)))
    | ~ subset(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    set_difference(X1,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(X1,X2))
    | set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X1)) != empty_set ),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,lemma,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X1),X2) = empty_set
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_54]) ).

fof(c_0_61,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
        | in(X8,X5)
        | in(X8,X6)
        | X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X6)
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_62,plain,
    ! [X2] : set_union2(X2,empty_set) = X2,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t1_boole]) ).

fof(c_0_63,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : set_union2(X3,X4) = set_union2(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,lemma,
    ( subset(esk1_0,X1)
    | ~ subset(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57]),c_0_49]),c_0_58]),c_0_40])]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(X1,singleton(X2)))
    | ~ in(X2,set_difference(singleton(X2),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).

fof(c_0_66,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( in(X8,X5)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X6)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
        | in(X8,X6)
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | in(esk4_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0])])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_67,plain,
    ! [X3] : subset(X3,X3),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

fof(c_0_68,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
      | set_intersection2(X3,X4) = X3 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t28_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_69,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] : subset(set_difference(X3,X4),X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t36_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( in(X4,X3)
    | in(X4,X2)
    | X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    set_union2(X1,empty_set) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk1_0,set_difference(esk2_0,singleton(esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,lemma,
    ( subset(esk1_0,set_difference(esk2_0,singleton(X1)))
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(singleton(X1),esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( in(X4,X1)
    | in(X4,X3)
    | X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,lemma,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,lemma,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X1
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_68]) ).

fof(c_0_79,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | ~ subset(X6,X5)
      | subset(set_union2(X4,X6),X5) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,lemma,
    subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,lemma,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_union2(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,lemma,
    set_union2(esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_48]),c_0_71]),c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk3_0,set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,lemma,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,lemma,
    ( set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = X1
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,lemma,
    ( subset(set_union2(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_79]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,lemma,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | in(X1,esk1_0)
    | X2 != esk2_0
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),c_0_85])]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

fof(c_0_92,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] : subset(X3,set_union2(X3,X4)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,lemma,
    ( set_difference(set_union2(X1,X2),set_difference(set_union2(X1,X2),X3)) = set_union2(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_94,lemma,
    ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,lemma,
    in(esk3_0,set_difference(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]),c_0_91]) ).

cnf(c_0_96,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_97,lemma,
    set_difference(set_difference(X1,X2),X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(set_union2(X1,esk1_0),set_difference(set_union2(X1,esk1_0),esk2_0)) = set_union2(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_99,lemma,
    subset(singleton(esk3_0),esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]) ).

cnf(c_0_100,lemma,
    ( subset(set_difference(X1,X2),set_difference(X3,X2))
    | ~ subset(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X1)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,lemma,
    set_union2(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_97]),c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(esk2_0,set_difference(esk2_0,set_union2(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_0)))) = set_union2(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_99]),c_0_72]),c_0_72]),c_0_53]),c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,lemma,
    subset(set_difference(X1,X2),set_difference(set_union2(X3,set_union2(X1,X2)),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,lemma,
    set_union2(esk2_0,set_union2(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_0))) = esk2_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,lemma,
    subset(set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_0)),set_difference(esk2_0,singleton(esk3_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105]) ).

cnf(c_0_107,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(esk2_0,singleton(esk3_0)))
    | ~ subset(X1,set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk1_0,set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk3_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_107]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,lemma,
    ~ in(esk3_0,set_difference(singleton(esk3_0),esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,lemma,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_84]),c_0_85])]),c_0_91]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU145+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:07:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.34/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/27.54  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.36/27.54  
% 0.36/27.54  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.36/27.54  # OLD status Res
% 0.36/27.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.36/27.54  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.36/27.54  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.36/27.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.36/27.54  
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof found!
% 0.36/27.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/27.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object total steps             : 111
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object clause steps            : 66
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object formula steps           : 45
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 26
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 22
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object generating inferences   : 35
% 0.36/27.54  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 26
% 0.36/27.54  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.36/27.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 66
% 0.36/27.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 19
% 0.36/27.54  # Initial clauses                      : 76
% 0.36/27.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.36/27.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 75
% 0.36/27.54  # Processed clauses                    : 19862
% 0.36/27.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 282
% 0.36/27.54  # ...subsumed                          : 15579
% 0.36/27.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4001
% 0.36/27.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 915
% 0.36/27.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.36/27.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 166
% 0.36/27.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 955
% 0.36/27.54  # Generated clauses                    : 214168
% 0.36/27.54  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 191746
% 0.36/27.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4236
% 0.36/27.54  # Paramodulations                      : 210983
% 0.36/27.54  # Factorizations                       : 200
% 0.36/27.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 1103
% 0.36/27.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2869
% 0.36/27.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 485
% 0.36/27.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 24
% 0.36/27.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 392
% 0.36/27.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1968
% 0.36/27.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 121792
% 0.36/27.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 402352
% 0.36/27.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.36/27.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1126
% 0.36/27.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3158656
% 0.36/27.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2157064
% 0.36/27.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11174
% 0.36/27.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 451142
% 0.36/27.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 191
% 0.36/27.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2091
% 0.36/27.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 534
% 0.36/27.54  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.36/27.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.36/27.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2995739
% 0.36/27.54  
% 0.36/27.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/27.54  # User time                : 4.030 s
% 0.36/27.54  # System time              : 0.066 s
% 0.36/27.54  # Total time               : 4.096 s
% 0.36/27.54  # Maximum resident set size: 114192 pages
% 0.36/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/46.44  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.44  
% 0.36/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.36/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.36/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------