↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU145+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.03s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU145+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:09:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.03/1.25  
% 1.03/1.25  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.03/1.25  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.03/1.25  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.03/1.25  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.03/1.25  SPASS derived 6463 clauses, backtracked 20 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 1860 clauses.
% 1.03/1.25  SPASS allocated 102212 KBytes.
% 1.03/1.25  SPASS spent	0:00:00.89 on the problem.
% 1.03/1.25  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.03/1.25  		0:00:00.11 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.03/1.25  		0:00:00.06 for inferences.
% 1.03/1.25  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.03/1.25  		0:00:00.64 for the reduction.
% 1.03/1.25  
% 1.03/1.25  
% 1.03/1.25  Here is a proof with depth 9, length 56 :
% 1.03/1.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.03/1.25  2[0:Inp] ||  -> empty(skc38)*.
% 1.03/1.25  3[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(skc5,skc7)*r.
% 1.03/1.25  7[0:Inp] || in(skc6,skc5)* -> .
% 1.03/1.25  11[0:Inp] || equal(singleton(u),empty_set)** -> .
% 1.03/1.25  13[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,empty_set),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  16[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,empty_set),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  17[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_difference(empty_set,u),empty_set)**.
% 1.03/1.25  20[0:Inp] empty(u) ||  -> equal(u,empty_set)*.
% 1.03/1.25  21[0:Inp] || subset(skc5,set_difference(skc7,singleton(skc6)))*r -> .
% 1.03/1.25  23[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,v),set_union2(v,u))*.
% 1.03/1.25  24[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,v),set_intersection2(v,u))*.
% 1.03/1.25  31[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v)*+ -> disjoint(v,u)*.
% 1.03/1.25  41[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(u,v) in(skf18(v,u),u)*.
% 1.03/1.25  42[0:Inp] ||  -> disjoint(u,v)* in(skf18(v,w),v)*.
% 1.03/1.25  53[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,set_difference(v,u)),set_union2(u,v))**.
% 1.03/1.25  54[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),v),set_difference(u,v))**.
% 1.03/1.25  55[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,set_difference(u,v)),set_intersection2(u,v))**.
% 1.03/1.25  56[0:Inp] || disjoint(u,v) -> equal(set_difference(u,v),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  64[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> subset(u,w)*.
% 1.03/1.25  66[0:Inp] || subset(u,v) -> subset(set_difference(u,w),set_difference(v,w))*.
% 1.03/1.25  69[0:Inp] || in(u,v)* equal(v,singleton(w))*+ -> equal(u,w)*.
% 1.03/1.25  122[0:Res:3.0,66.0] ||  -> subset(set_difference(skc5,u),set_difference(skc7,u))*r.
% 1.03/1.25  185[0:EmS:20.0,2.0] ||  -> equal(empty_set,skc38)**.
% 1.03/1.25  188[0:Rew:185.0,17.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(skc38,u),skc38)**.
% 1.03/1.25  190[0:Rew:185.0,11.0] || equal(singleton(u),skc38)** -> .
% 1.03/1.25  191[0:Rew:185.0,16.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,skc38),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  192[0:Rew:185.0,13.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,skc38),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  234[0:SpR:23.0,192.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(skc38,u),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  270[0:Res:42.0,31.0] ||  -> in(skf18(u,v),u)* disjoint(u,w)*.
% 1.03/1.25  329[0:SpR:23.0,54.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),u),set_difference(v,u))**.
% 1.03/1.25  331[0:SpR:234.0,54.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,u),set_difference(skc38,u))*.
% 1.03/1.25  333[0:Rew:188.0,331.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,u),skc38)**.
% 1.03/1.25  348[0:SpR:53.0,54.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),set_difference(v,u)),set_difference(u,set_difference(v,u)))**.
% 1.03/1.25  406[0:SpR:329.0,53.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,set_difference(v,u)),set_union2(u,set_union2(u,v)))**.
% 1.03/1.25  409[0:SpR:329.0,55.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),set_difference(v,u)),set_intersection2(set_union2(u,v),u))**.
% 1.03/1.25  422[0:Rew:53.0,406.0] ||  -> equal(set_union2(u,set_union2(u,v)),set_union2(u,v))**.
% 1.03/1.25  424[0:Rew:24.0,409.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),set_difference(v,u)),set_intersection2(u,set_union2(u,v)))**.
% 1.03/1.25  425[0:Rew:348.0,424.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,set_difference(v,u)),set_intersection2(u,set_union2(u,v)))**.
% 1.03/1.25  470[0:SpR:422.0,54.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(set_union2(u,v),set_union2(u,v)),set_difference(u,set_union2(u,v)))**.
% 1.03/1.25  488[0:Rew:333.0,470.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,set_union2(u,v)),skc38)**.
% 1.03/1.25  492[0:SpR:488.0,55.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,set_union2(u,v)),set_difference(u,skc38))**.
% 1.03/1.25  493[0:SpR:488.0,56.1] || disjoint(u,set_union2(u,v))* -> equal(skc38,u).
% 1.03/1.25  506[0:Rew:191.0,492.0] ||  -> equal(set_intersection2(u,set_union2(u,v)),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  507[0:Rew:506.0,425.0] ||  -> equal(set_difference(u,set_difference(v,u)),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  563[0:SpR:56.1,507.0] || disjoint(u,v) -> equal(set_difference(v,u),v)**.
% 1.03/1.25  875[0:Res:270.1,493.0] ||  -> in(skf18(u,v),u)* equal(skc38,u).
% 1.03/1.25  994[0:EqR:69.1] || in(u,singleton(v))* -> equal(u,v).
% 1.03/1.25  997[0:Res:875.0,994.0] ||  -> equal(singleton(u),skc38) equal(skf18(singleton(u),v),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  1003[0:MRR:997.0,190.0] ||  -> equal(skf18(singleton(u),v),u)**.
% 1.03/1.25  1037[0:SpR:1003.0,41.1] ||  -> disjoint(u,singleton(v))* in(v,u).
% 1.03/1.25  1046[0:Res:1037.0,31.0] ||  -> in(u,v) disjoint(singleton(u),v)*.
% 1.03/1.25  7541[0:NCh:64.2,64.1,122.0,21.0] || equal(set_difference(skc5,singleton(skc6)),skc5)** -> .
% 1.03/1.25  7546[0:SpL:563.1,7541.0] || disjoint(singleton(skc6),skc5)* equal(skc5,skc5) -> .
% 1.03/1.25  7552[0:Obv:7546.1] || disjoint(singleton(skc6),skc5)* -> .
% 1.03/1.25  7565[0:Res:1046.1,7552.0] ||  -> in(skc6,skc5)*.
% 1.03/1.25  7567[0:MRR:7565.0,7.0] ||  -> .
% 1.03/1.25  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.03/1.25  Formulae used in the proof : rc1_xboole_0 l3_zfmisc_1 l1_zfmisc_1 t1_boole t3_boole t4_boole t6_boole commutativity_k2_xboole_0 commutativity_k3_xboole_0 symmetry_r1_xboole_0 t3_xboole_0 t39_xboole_1 t40_xboole_1 t48_xboole_1 t83_xboole_1 t1_xboole_1 t33_xboole_1 d1_tarski
% 1.03/1.25  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------