↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU146+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.12s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  27   ~;  37   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   2 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l3_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => ( in(X3,X1)
        | subset(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t37_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(l4_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t3_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( subset(X1,empty_set)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(l2_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    <=> in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t2_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : subset(empty_set,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31] :
      ( ~ subset(X29,X30)
      | in(X31,X29)
      | subset(X29,set_difference(X30,singleton(X31))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l3_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X36] : subset(X36,X36),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X3,X1)
    | subset(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3)))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X38,X39] :
      ( ( set_difference(X38,X39) != empty_set
        | subset(X38,X39) )
      & ( ~ subset(X38,X39)
        | set_difference(X38,X39) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
      <=> ( X1 = empty_set
          | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l4_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_difference(X1,singleton(X2)))
    | in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( set_difference(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0 != empty_set
      | ~ subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) )
    & ( esk1_0 != singleton(esk2_0)
      | ~ subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) )
    & ( subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0))
      | esk1_0 = empty_set
      | esk1_0 = singleton(esk2_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X40] :
      ( ~ subset(X40,empty_set)
      | X40 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ( subset(X25,X26)
        | X25 != X26 )
      & ( subset(X26,X25)
        | X25 != X26 )
      & ( ~ subset(X25,X26)
        | ~ subset(X26,X25)
        | X25 = X26 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( ( ~ subset(singleton(X27),X28)
        | in(X27,X28) )
      & ( ~ in(X27,X28)
        | subset(singleton(X27),X28) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l2_zfmisc_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(X1,empty_set)
    | in(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0))
    | esk1_0 = empty_set
    | esk1_0 = singleton(esk2_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | esk1_0 = empty_set
    | in(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | esk1_0 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(singleton(esk2_0),esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != singleton(esk2_0)
    | ~ subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk2_0) = esk1_0
    | esk1_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X37] : subset(empty_set,X37),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem    : SEU146+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.07/0.24  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.24  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.24  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.24  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.24  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 21:46:41 EDT 2026
% 0.07/0.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.07/0.25  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.12/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.12/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.12/1.62  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------