↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU146+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   68 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  178 (  69 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  182 (  72   ~;  69   |;  31   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  120 (   7 sgn  73   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t4_xboole_0,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).

fof(t48_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_intersection2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(t3_xboole_0,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X2) ) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X1)
              & in(X3,X2) )
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t2_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : set_intersection2(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_boole) ).

fof(t3_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] : set_difference(X1,empty_set) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_boole) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(l4_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(l2_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    <=> in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t2_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : subset(empty_set,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_14,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t4_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_15,lemma,
    ! [X272,X273,X275,X276,X277] :
      ( ( disjoint(X272,X273)
        | in(esk14_2(X272,X273),set_intersection2(X272,X273)) )
      & ( ~ in(X277,set_intersection2(X275,X276))
        | ~ disjoint(X275,X276) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,lemma,
    ! [X269,X270] : set_difference(X269,set_difference(X269,X270)) = set_intersection2(X269,X270),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_17,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] :
              ~ ( in(X3,X1)
                & in(X3,X2) ) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X1)
              & in(X3,X2) )
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X243] : set_intersection2(X243,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_boole]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ disjoint(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
    set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_intersection2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_21,lemma,
    ! [X258,X259,X261,X262,X263] :
      ( ( in(esk13_2(X258,X259),X258)
        | disjoint(X258,X259) )
      & ( in(esk13_2(X258,X259),X259)
        | disjoint(X258,X259) )
      & ( ~ in(X263,X261)
        | ~ in(X263,X262)
        | ~ disjoint(X261,X262) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X257] : set_difference(X257,empty_set) = X257,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t3_boole]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
    ( ~ disjoint(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    ( in(esk13_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,empty_set)) = empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    set_difference(X1,empty_set) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
    ( in(esk13_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ in(X3,set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    set_difference(X1,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X155,X156,X157] :
      ( ( X155 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X156,X155) )
      & ( in(esk2_1(X157),X157)
        | X157 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
      <=> ( X1 = empty_set
          | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l4_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X148,X149,X150,X151,X152,X153] :
      ( ( ~ in(X150,X149)
        | X150 = X148
        | X149 != singleton(X148) )
      & ( X151 != X148
        | in(X151,X149)
        | X149 != singleton(X148) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X152,X153),X153)
        | esk1_2(X152,X153) != X152
        | X153 = singleton(X152) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X152,X153),X153)
        | esk1_2(X152,X153) = X152
        | X153 = singleton(X152) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_34,lemma,
    ! [X283] : unordered_pair(X283,X283) = singleton(X283),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_35,plain,
    ! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X177,X178)
        | ~ in(X179,X177)
        | in(X179,X178) )
      & ( in(esk5_2(X180,X181),X180)
        | subset(X180,X181) )
      & ( ~ in(esk5_2(X180,X181),X181)
        | subset(X180,X181) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
    ( in(esk13_2(X1,X1),X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( in(esk2_1(X1),X1)
    | X1 = empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

fof(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk8_0 != empty_set
      | ~ subset(esk8_0,singleton(esk9_0)) )
    & ( esk8_0 != singleton(esk9_0)
      | ~ subset(esk8_0,singleton(esk9_0)) )
    & ( subset(esk8_0,singleton(esk9_0))
      | esk8_0 = empty_set
      | esk8_0 = singleton(esk9_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk13_2(X1,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk8_0,singleton(esk9_0))
    | esk8_0 = empty_set
    | esk8_0 = singleton(esk9_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk13_2(X1,X1),X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk8_0 = empty_set
    | esk8_0 = unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)
    | subset(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_40]),c_0_40]) ).

fof(c_0_47,lemma,
    ! [X213,X214] :
      ( ( ~ subset(singleton(X213),X214)
        | in(X213,X214) )
      & ( ~ in(X213,X214)
        | subset(singleton(X213),X214) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l2_zfmisc_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0) = esk8_0
    | esk8_0 = empty_set
    | in(esk13_2(esk8_0,esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

fof(c_0_50,plain,
    ! [X146,X147] :
      ( ( subset(X146,X147)
        | X146 != X147 )
      & ( subset(X147,X146)
        | X146 != X147 )
      & ( ~ subset(X146,X147)
        | ~ subset(X147,X146)
        | X146 = X147 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,lemma,
    ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0) = esk8_0
    | esk13_2(esk8_0,esk8_0) = esk9_0
    | esk8_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk8_0 != singleton(esk9_0)
    | ~ subset(esk8_0,singleton(esk9_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,lemma,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,lemma,
    ( unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0) = esk8_0
    | esk8_0 = empty_set
    | in(esk9_0,esk8_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0) = esk8_0
    | esk8_0 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0),esk8_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_46]) ).

fof(c_0_58,plain,
    ! [X224] : subset(X224,X224),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk8_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk8_0,singleton(esk9_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk8_0 != unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)
    | ~ subset(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_40]),c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,lemma,
    ( unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0) = esk8_0
    | esk8_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_58]) ).

fof(c_0_63,lemma,
    ! [X247] : subset(empty_set,X247),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk8_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_0 = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_62])]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,lemma,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_65]),c_0_66])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU146+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 03:08:30 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------