↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU147+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 207.30s 27.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 207.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  119 (  79 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  121 (  40   ~;  61   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   2 sgn  42   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( B = powerset(A)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> subset(C,A) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,A) = A,
    file('theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t3_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( subset(A,empty_set)
     => A = empty_set ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [A] : unordered_pair(A,A) = singleton(A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(t1_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) = singleton(empty_set),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t1_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t1_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    ( subset(C,A)
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | powerset(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    ( ~ subset(C,A)
    | in(C,B)
    | powerset(A) != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(nnf_10,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ? [D] :
            ( ( ( D != B
                & D != A )
              | ~ in(D,C) )
            & ( D = B
              | D = A
              | in(D,C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) = C )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( ( X0 != B
                & X0 != A )
              | in(X0,C) )
            & ( X0 = B
              | X0 = A
              | ~ in(X0,C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d2_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ( ( ( sK0(A,B,C) != B
              & sK0(A,B,C) != A )
            | ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),C) )
          & ( sK0(A,B,C) = B
            | sK0(A,B,C) = A
            | in(sK0(A,B,C),C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) = C )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( ( ( X0 != B
                & X0 != A )
              | in(X0,C) )
            & ( X0 = B
              | X0 = A
              | ~ in(X0,C) ) )
        | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(D,sK0(A,B,C))],[nnf_10]) ).

fof(sk_d2_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) != VAR_1
        | ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) != VAR_0
        | ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) = VAR_1
        | sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) = VAR_0
        | in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2),VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_1
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_0
        | in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 = VAR_1
        | VAR_3 = VAR_0
        | ~ in(VAR_3,VAR_2)
        | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,C) = B
    | sK0(A,B,C) = A
    | in(sK0(A,B,C),C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) = C ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,C) != B
    | ~ in(sK0(A,B,C),C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) = C ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_123,plain,
    set_union2(A,A) = A,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_136,plain,
    subset(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_156,plain,
    ( empty_set = A
    | ~ subset(A,empty_set) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_168,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

cnf(c_176,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t1_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_177,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) != unordered_pair(empty_set,empty_set),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_168,c_176]) ).

cnf(c_7611,plain,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | ~ in(A,powerset(B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

cnf(c_7612,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,powerset(C)) = B
    | sK0(A,B,powerset(C)) = A
    | unordered_pair(A,B) = powerset(C)
    | subset(sK0(A,B,powerset(C)),C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7611,c_91]) ).

cnf(c_255,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,powerset(C)) = B
    | sK0(A,B,powerset(C)) = A
    | powerset(C) = unordered_pair(A,B)
    | subset(sK0(A,B,powerset(C)),C) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_7612]) ).

cnf(c_7613,plain,
    A = set_union2(A,A),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_123]) ).

cnf(c_7614,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | in(A,set_union2(powerset(B),powerset(B))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_7613]) ).

cnf(c_7615,plain,
    in(A,set_union2(powerset(A),powerset(A))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_7614,c_136]) ).

cnf(c_541,plain,
    in(A,powerset(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_7615]) ).

cnf(c_7616,plain,
    ( empty_set = sK0(A,B,powerset(empty_set))
    | sK0(A,B,powerset(empty_set)) = B
    | sK0(A,B,powerset(empty_set)) = A
    | powerset(empty_set) = unordered_pair(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_255,c_156]) ).

cnf(c_4227,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,powerset(empty_set)) = empty_set
    | sK0(A,B,powerset(empty_set)) = B
    | sK0(A,B,powerset(empty_set)) = A
    | powerset(empty_set) = unordered_pair(A,B) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_7616]) ).

cnf(c_4245,plain,
    ( sK0(A,A,powerset(empty_set)) = empty_set
    | sK0(A,A,powerset(empty_set)) = A
    | powerset(empty_set) = unordered_pair(A,A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_4227]) ).

cnf(c_7617,plain,
    ( sK0(empty_set,empty_set,powerset(empty_set)) = empty_set
    | powerset(empty_set) = unordered_pair(empty_set,empty_set) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_4245]) ).

cnf(c_4260,negated_conjecture,
    sK0(empty_set,empty_set,powerset(empty_set)) = empty_set,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_177,c_7617]) ).

cnf(c_7618,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(empty_set,empty_set,powerset(empty_set)),powerset(empty_set))
    | unordered_pair(empty_set,empty_set) = powerset(empty_set) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4260,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_7619,plain,
    ( ~ in(empty_set,powerset(empty_set))
    | unordered_pair(empty_set,empty_set) = powerset(empty_set) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_4260,c_7618]) ).

cnf(c_7620,plain,
    ( ~ in(empty_set,powerset(empty_set))
    | powerset(empty_set) = unordered_pair(empty_set,empty_set) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_7619]) ).

cnf(c_7621,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(empty_set,powerset(empty_set)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_177,c_7620]) ).

cnf(c_7610,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_541,c_7621]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU147+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:39:51 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.43  % Process 2354370 was started by sandbox on n013,
% 0.15/0.43  % Sat Sep 26 08:39:51 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.46  
% 0.15/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 207.30/27.71  
% 207.30/27.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 207.30/27.71  
% 207.30/27.71  % Proof 1 at 2.38 (+ 0.73) seconds.
% 207.30/27.71  % Length of proof is 23.
% 207.30/27.71  % Level of proof is 6.
% 207.30/27.71  % Maximum clause weight is 27.000.
% 207.30/27.71  % Given clauses 307.
% 207.30/27.71  
% 207.30/27.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------