↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU147+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:47 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.25s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  23   ~;  31   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   1 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(t3_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( subset(X1,empty_set)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(d1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = powerset(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> subset(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t1_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) = singleton(empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( ~ in(X24,X23)
        | X24 = X22
        | X23 != singleton(X22) )
      & ( X25 != X22
        | in(X25,X23)
        | X23 != singleton(X22) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X26,X27),X27)
        | esk1_2(X26,X27) != X26
        | X27 = singleton(X26) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X26,X27),X27)
        | esk1_2(X26,X27) = X26
        | X27 = singleton(X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X42] :
      ( ~ subset(X42,empty_set)
      | X42 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ( ~ in(X31,X30)
        | subset(X31,X29)
        | X30 != powerset(X29) )
      & ( ~ subset(X32,X29)
        | in(X32,X30)
        | X30 != powerset(X29) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_2(X33,X34),X34)
        | ~ subset(esk2_2(X33,X34),X33)
        | X34 = powerset(X33) )
      & ( in(esk2_2(X33,X34),X34)
        | subset(esk2_2(X33,X34),X33)
        | X34 = powerset(X33) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | X2 = powerset(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( esk2_2(empty_set,X1) = empty_set
    | X1 = powerset(empty_set)
    | in(esk2_2(empty_set,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t1_zfmisc_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( esk2_2(empty_set,singleton(X1)) = empty_set
    | esk2_2(empty_set,singleton(X1)) = X1
    | singleton(X1) = powerset(empty_set) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    powerset(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X38] : subset(X38,X38),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X2 = powerset(X1)
    | ~ in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | ~ subset(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    esk2_2(empty_set,singleton(empty_set)) = empty_set,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU147+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:45:33 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.72  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------