↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU150+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.91s 21.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  18 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (  41 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  13   ~;   7   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  35   !;   3   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(f64,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(f72,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
     => X0 = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f73,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t9_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f74,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
       => X1 = X2 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f73]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( singleton(X0) != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
      & X1 != X2 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ( singleton(sK13) = unordered_pair(sK14,sK15)
    & sK14 != sK15 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13,sK14,sK15]),skolemize(X0,sK13),skolemize(X1,sK14),skolemize(X2,sK15)],[f115]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f257,plain,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f266,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X0) != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).

fof(f267,plain,
    singleton(sK13) = unordered_pair(sK14,sK15),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159]) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    sK14 != sK15,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159]) ).

fof(f299,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( unordered_pair(X0,X0) != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
      | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f266,f257]) ).

fof(f300,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK14,sK15) = unordered_pair(sK13,sK13),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f267,f257]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).

tcf(c_153,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( unordered_pair(X0,X0) != unordered_pair(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f299]) ).

tcf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    sK14 != sK15,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).

tcf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK14,sK15) = unordered_pair(sK13,sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f300]) ).

tcf(c_2331,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = unordered_pair(sK14,sK15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2332,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = unordered_pair(sK13,sK13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2333,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_10 = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_155,c_2332,c_2331]) ).

tcf(c_2334,negated_conjecture,
    sK14 != sK15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_154]) ).

tcf(c_3881,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK13,sK13) = iPr_def_10,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2332,c_2333]) ).

tcf(c_3945,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK13 )
      | ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) != iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3881,c_153]) ).

tcf(c_4030,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = sK13 )
      | ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) != iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_3945]) ).

tcf(c_4033,plain,
    sK14 = sK13,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2331,c_3945]) ).

tcf(c_4060,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = sK14 )
      | ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) != iPr_def_10 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4030,c_4033]) ).

tcf(c_4070,plain,
    sK14 = sK15,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2331,c_4060]) ).

tcf(c_4072,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4070,c_2334]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU150+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/20.59  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/20.59  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/20.59  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/20.59  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/20.59  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/20.59  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/20.59  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/20.59  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:57:47 UTC 2026
% 0.16/20.60  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/20.60  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/20.64  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/20.64  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/20.65  
% 0.16/20.65  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.16/20.65  
% 0.16/20.66  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.16/20.67  % Proving...
% 3.91/21.53  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/21.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.91/21.53  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.91/21.53  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Proving...
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % 
% 3.91/21.53  % clauses                               98
% 3.91/21.53  % conjectures                           2
% 3.91/21.53  % EPR                                   23
% 3.91/21.53  % Horn                                  77
% 3.91/21.53  % unary                                 27
% 3.91/21.53  % binary                                38
% 3.91/21.53  % lits                                  206
% 3.91/21.53  % lits eq                               62
% 3.91/21.53  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.91/21.53  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.91/21.53  % fd_cond                               3
% 3.91/21.53  % fd_pseudo_cond                        24
% 3.91/21.53  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ 
% 3.91/21.53  % Current options:
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % ------ Proving...
% 3.91/21.53  % 
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/21.53  
% 3.91/21.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.91/21.54  
% 3.91/21.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------