↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SEU150+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:58:13 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 15.43s
% Output   : Proof 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (  53 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  23   ~;  14   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   1 sgn  24   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(t8_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( singleton(A) = unordered_pair(B,C)
     => A = B ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t8_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t9_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( singleton(A) = unordered_pair(B,C)
     => B = C ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t9_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f_1_1,plain,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

fof(f_1_2,plain,
    ! [U_1,U_0] : unordered_pair(U_1,U_0) = unordered_pair(U_0,U_1),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

cnf(f_1_3,plain,
    unordered_pair(U_1,U_0) = unordered_pair(U_0,U_1),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_4_1,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( A = B
      | singleton(A) != unordered_pair(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_4_2,plain,
    ! [U_6,U_5,U_4] :
      ( U_6 = U_5
      | singleton(U_6) != unordered_pair(U_5,U_4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_4_1]) ).

fof(f_4_3,plain,
    ! [U_6,U_5] :
      ( ! [U_4] : singleton(U_6) != unordered_pair(U_5,U_4)
      | U_6 = U_5 ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_4_2]) ).

cnf(f_4_4,plain,
    ( singleton(U_6) != unordered_pair(U_5,U_4)
    | U_6 = U_5 ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_4_3]) ).

fof(f_5_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( singleton(A) = unordered_pair(B,C)
       => B = C ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[t9_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(f_5_2,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( B != C
      & singleton(A) = unordered_pair(B,C) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_5_1]) ).

fof(f_5_3,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_9,U_8,U_7] :
      ( U_8 != U_7
      & singleton(U_9) = unordered_pair(U_8,U_7) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_5_2]) ).

fof(f_5_4,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_8,U_7] :
      ( U_8 != U_7
      & singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(U_8,U_7) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(U_9,sK3)],[f_5_3]) ).

fof(f_5_5,negated_conjecture,
    ? [U_7] :
      ( sK4 != U_7
      & singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK4,U_7) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(U_8,sK4)],[f_5_4]) ).

fof(f_5_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK4 != sK5
    & singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5]),skolemize(U_7,sK5)],[f_5_5]) ).

fof(f_5_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK4 != sK5
    & singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK5) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_5_6]) ).

cnf(f_5_8,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK5),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_5_7]) ).

cnf(f_5_9,negated_conjecture,
    sK4 != sK5,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_5_7]) ).

cnf(equality_2,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_1 = Eq_x_0
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[symmetry]) ).

cnf(equality_3,axiom,
    ( Eq_x_0 = Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_1 != Eq_x_2
    | Eq_x_0 != Eq_x_1 ),
    theory(equality,[transitivity]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    sK4 != sK5,
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_5_9]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( sK3 != sK5
    | sK4 != sK3
    | sK4 = sK5 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( sK3 != sK4
    | sK4 = sK3 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[equality_2]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( singleton(sK3) != unordered_pair(sK4,sK5)
    | sK3 = sK4 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_4_4]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK5),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_5_8]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    ( singleton(sK3) != unordered_pair(sK5,sK4)
    | sK3 = sK5 ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[f_4_4]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t2:3]) ).

cnf(t12,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(sK4,sK5) != unordered_pair(sK5,sK4)
    | singleton(sK3) != unordered_pair(sK4,sK5)
    | singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK5,sK4) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:2)],[equality_3]) ).

cnf(t13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t10:2]) ).

cnf(t14,plain,
    singleton(sK3) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK5),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:2)],[f_5_8]) ).

cnf(t15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t12:2]) ).

cnf(t16,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK4,sK5) = unordered_pair(sK5,sK4),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t12:3)],[f_1_3]) ).

cnf(t17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t12:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU150+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34   % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/15.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/15.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/15.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 23:23:27 UTC 2026
% 0.07/15.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/15.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/15.43  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------