↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SEU150+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 04:53:22 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  12   ~;   6   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   4 sgn  19   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/tmp/tmpOtItnN/sel_SEU150+3.p_1',t8_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/tmp/tmpOtItnN/sel_SEU150+3.p_1',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(5,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
     => X2 = X3 ),
    file('/tmp/tmpOtItnN/sel_SEU150+3.p_1',t9_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
       => X2 = X3 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[5]) ).

fof(8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( singleton(X1) != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
      | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

fof(9,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( singleton(X4) != unordered_pair(X5,X6)
      | X4 = X5 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | singleton(X1) != unordered_pair(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

fof(14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

fof(19,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
      & X2 != X3 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(20,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( singleton(X4) = unordered_pair(X5,X6)
      & X5 != X6 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

fof(21,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk3_0) = unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & esk4_0 != esk5_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[20]) ).

cnf(22,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 != esk5_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

cnf(23,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk3_0) = unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

cnf(24,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 = X1
    | unordered_pair(X1,X2) != unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[10,23,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(25,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | unordered_pair(X3,X2) != singleton(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[10,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk4_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[24,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk3_0) = unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[23,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(31,negated_conjecture,
    esk5_0 != esk3_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[22,27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(34,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk3_0 = X1
    | unordered_pair(X2,X1) != unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[25,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[40,31,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(44,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    43,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU150+3.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpOtItnN/sel_SEU150+3.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SEU150+3.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU150+3.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU150+3.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------