↑ Up

Twee---2.7.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SEU150+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:45:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.46s
% Output   : Proof 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU150+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 03:45:55 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.18/0.46  Axiom 1 (commutativity_k2_tarski): unordered_pair(X, Y) = unordered_pair(Y, X).
% 0.18/0.46  Axiom 2 (t9_zfmisc_1): singleton(a) = unordered_pair(b, c).
% 0.18/0.46  Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 0.18/0.46  Axiom 4 (t8_zfmisc_1): ifeq(singleton(X), unordered_pair(Y, Z), X, Y) = Y.
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  Goal 1 (t9_zfmisc_1_1): b = c.
% 0.18/0.46  Proof:
% 0.18/0.46    b
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    ifeq(singleton(b), singleton(b), b, c)
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 4 (t8_zfmisc_1) R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    ifeq(singleton(b), singleton(ifeq(singleton(a), unordered_pair(b, c), a, b)), b, c)
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 2 (t9_zfmisc_1) R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    ifeq(singleton(b), singleton(ifeq(singleton(a), singleton(a), a, b)), b, c)
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 0.18/0.46    ifeq(singleton(b), singleton(a), b, c)
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 2 (t9_zfmisc_1) }
% 0.18/0.46    ifeq(singleton(b), unordered_pair(b, c), b, c)
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_k2_tarski) R->L }
% 0.18/0.46    ifeq(singleton(b), unordered_pair(c, b), b, c)
% 0.18/0.46  = { by axiom 4 (t8_zfmisc_1) }
% 0.18/0.46    c
% 0.18/0.46  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.18/0.46  
% 0.18/0.46  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------