↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SEU151+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:01:22 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SEU151+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 15:28:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.50/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.65  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.56/0.65  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.65  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.56/0.65  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.56/0.65  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/0.65  
% 0.56/0.65  % Result      :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.56/0.65  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.56/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  % File     : SEU151+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.56/0.66  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.56/0.66  % Problem  : Basic properties of sets, theorem 10
% 0.56/0.66  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.56/0.66  % English  :
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.56/0.66  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.56/0.66  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.56/0.66  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t10_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/0.66  % Rating   : 0.19 v7.5.0, 0.22 v7.4.0, 0.13 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.10 v7.1.0, 0.13 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.32 v6.1.0, 0.33 v6.0.0, 0.26 v5.5.0, 0.19 v5.4.0, 0.18 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.21 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.22 v4.0.0, 0.21 v3.7.0, 0.15 v3.5.0, 0.16 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.56/0.66  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of atoms       :   12 (   7 equ)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   1   |;   2   &)
% 0.56/0.66  %                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.66  %            Number of variables   :   14 (  12   !;   2   ?)
% 0.56/0.66  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.56/0.66  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.56/0.66  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/0.66        ( in(A,B)
% 0.56/0.66       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.56/0.66        ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
% 0.56/0.66      <=> ! [D] :
% 0.56/0.66            ( in(D,C)
% 0.56/0.66          <=> ( D = A
% 0.56/0.66              | D = B ) ) ) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/0.66      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  fof(t10_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.56/0.66      ! [A,B,C,D] :
% 0.56/0.66        ~ ( unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(C,D)
% 0.56/0.66          & A != C
% 0.56/0.66          & A != D ) ).
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.66  % Proof found
% 0.56/0.66  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.66  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.66  %ClaNum:24(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.56/0.66  %VarNum:68(SingletonVarNum:25)
% 0.56/0.66  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.56/0.66  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.56/0.66  %SharedTerms:13
% 0.56/0.66  %goalClause: 13 15 16
% 0.56/0.66  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.56/0.66  [12]P1(a1)
% 0.56/0.66  [15]~E(a3,a7)
% 0.56/0.66  [16]~E(a3,a8)
% 0.56/0.66  [17]~P1(a4)
% 0.56/0.66  [13]E(f6(a3,a5),f6(a7,a8))
% 0.56/0.66  [14]E(f6(x141,x142),f6(x142,x141))
% 0.56/0.66  [20]~P2(x202,x201)+~P2(x201,x202)
% 0.56/0.66  [23]~E(f2(x232,x233,x231),x233)+~P2(f2(x232,x233,x231),x231)+E(x231,f6(x232,x233))
% 0.56/0.66  [24]~E(f2(x242,x243,x241),x242)+~P2(f2(x242,x243,x241),x241)+E(x241,f6(x242,x243))
% 0.56/0.66  [18]P2(x181,x182)+~E(x181,x183)+~E(x182,f6(x184,x183))
% 0.56/0.66  [19]P2(x191,x192)+~E(x191,x193)+~E(x192,f6(x193,x194))
% 0.56/0.66  [22]E(f2(x222,x223,x221),x223)+E(f2(x222,x223,x221),x222)+P2(f2(x222,x223,x221),x221)+E(x221,f6(x222,x223))
% 0.56/0.66  [21]~P2(x211,x214)+E(x211,x212)+E(x211,x213)+~E(x214,f6(x213,x212))
% 0.56/0.66  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.66  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/0.66  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/0.66  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/0.66  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41,x43),f6(x42,x43))
% 0.56/0.66  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x53,x51),f6(x53,x52))
% 0.56/0.66  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x61,x63,x64),f2(x62,x63,x64))
% 0.56/0.66  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x73,x71,x74),f2(x73,x72,x74))
% 0.56/0.66  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f2(x83,x84,x81),f2(x83,x84,x82))
% 0.56/0.66  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.56/0.66  [10]P2(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x101,x103)
% 0.56/0.66  [11]P2(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x111)
% 0.56/0.66  
% 0.56/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (~P2(x251,f6(x252,x253))+E(x251,x253)+E(x251,x252)),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(equality_inference,[],[21])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(a7,a8),f6(a3,a5))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,2])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(x281,x282),f6(x282,x281))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (P2(f6(a3,a5),f6(x301,f6(a7,a8)))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,14,28,2,18,19])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(31,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(x311,x312),f6(x312,x311))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(a5,a3),f6(a7,a8))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,15,14,28,31,2,18,19,25,3])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(36,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(x361,x362),f6(x362,x361))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (P2(f6(a7,a8),f6(f6(a7,a8),x371))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,15,14,28,31,2,18,19,25,3,10])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (~P2(a3,f6(a3,a5))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[13,15,16,14,28,31,36,2,18,19,25,3,10,11,21])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(47,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(a7,a8),f6(a5,a3))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,35,20,2])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(50,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (~E(a3,a5)),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,40,30,35,14,20,2,25,19])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (E(f6(x511,x512),f6(x512,x511))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(rename_variables,[],[14])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(55,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (~P2(a3,f6(a7,a8))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[16,40,30,26,35,14,51,20,2,25,19,18,21])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(64,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     (P2(f6(a5,a3),f6(x641,f6(a7,a8)))),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[47,55,50,26,37,14,20,25,19,10,11])).
% 0.57/0.67  cnf(86,plain,
% 0.57/0.67     ($false),
% 0.57/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[47,26,55,64,20,18,19]),
% 0.57/0.67     ['proof']).
% 0.57/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.57/0.67  % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------