↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU151+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 5.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  23   ~;  10   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   3 sgn  12   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(t10_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ~ ( A != D
        & A != C
        & unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(C,D) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t10_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t10_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ~ ( A != D
          & A != C
          & unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(C,D) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t10_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( D = B
    | D = A
    | ~ in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( D != A
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ? [A,B,C,D] :
      ( D != A
      & C != A
      & unordered_pair(C,D) = unordered_pair(A,B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t10_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( sK1 != sK2
    & sK0 != sK2
    & unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) = unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(A,sK2),skolemize(B,sK3),skolemize(C,sK0),skolemize(D,sK1)],[nnf_6]) ).

cnf(c_17,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) = unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t10_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t10_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t10_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    ( A != B
    | in(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_10]) ).

cnf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    ( A = sK1
    | A = sK0
    | ~ in(A,unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_18]) ).

cnf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK2 = sK1
    | ~ in(sK2,unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_87]) ).

cnf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 != sK1,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_19]) ).

cnf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK2,unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_26]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_61]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU151+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:40:58 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/5.37  % Process 2356419 was started by sandbox2 on n013,
% 0.09/5.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:40:58 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/5.38  
% 0.09/5.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/5.39  
% 0.09/5.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/5.39  
% 0.09/5.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/5.39  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.09/5.39  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.09/5.39  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 0.09/5.39  % Given clauses 18.
% 0.09/5.39  
% 0.09/5.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------