↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU152+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   92 (  47   ~;  37   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   97 (   2 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

fof(l23_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(singleton(X1),X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l23_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l2_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    <=> in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(i_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[antisymmetry_r2_hidden]) ).

fof(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( in(X1,X2)
       => set_union2(singleton(X1),X2) = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l23_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(i_0_9,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ( ~ subset(singleton(X24),X25)
        | in(X24,X25) )
      & ( ~ in(X24,X25)
        | subset(singleton(X24),X25) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l2_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(i_0_10,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] :
      ( ~ in(X17,X18)
      | ~ in(X18,X17) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_7])]) ).

fof(i_0_11,plain,
    ! [X27,X28] :
      ( ~ subset(X27,X28)
      | set_union2(X27,X28) = X28 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(i_0_12,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] : set_union2(X19,X20) = set_union2(X20,X19),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & set_union2(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_8])])]) ).

fof(i_0_14,plain,
    ! [X21] : set_union2(X21,X21) = X21,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(i_0_15,plain,
    ! [X26] : subset(X26,X26),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(i_0_16,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_9]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_10]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_9]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_11]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_20,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_12]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0) != esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_13]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_15]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_13]),
    [final] ).

cnf(i_0_25,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_26,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_27,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_28,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | set_union2(X1,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_29,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | set_union2(X3,X1) = set_union2(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_30,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_31,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X3,X1)
    | in(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_32,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_33,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_25_001,axiom,
    X1 = X1 ).

cnf(i_0_26_002,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X2 != X1 ) ).

cnf(i_0_27_003,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 != X3
    | X3 != X2 ) ).

cnf(i_0_28_004,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | set_union2(X1,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_29_005,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | set_union2(X3,X1) = set_union2(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_30_006,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | in(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_31_007,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ in(X3,X1)
    | in(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_32_008,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X3)
    | subset(X2,X3) ) ).

cnf(i_0_33_009,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ subset(X3,X1)
    | subset(X3,X2) ) ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ~ subset(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0),
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_21,i_0_19]) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_19]) ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    ~ in(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_21,i_0_24,i_0_19,i_0_17]) ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_17]) ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    X1 = set_union2(X1,X1),
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_21,i_0_24,i_0_22,i_0_19,i_0_17,i_0_26]) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_21,i_0_24,i_0_23,i_0_22,i_0_19,i_0_17,i_0_26,i_0_16]) ).

cnf(i_0_40,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_23]) ).

cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(X1),X2)
    | in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_16]) ).

cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_21,i_0_24,i_0_23,i_0_22,i_0_19,i_0_17,i_0_26,i_0_16,i_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : SEU152+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:46:25 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.26/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.26/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.65  % Total time : 1.271s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------