↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU153+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   88 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  40   ~;  38   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   2 sgn  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l25_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( disjoint(singleton(X1),X2)
        & in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l25_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
     => disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ~ ( disjoint(singleton(X1),X2)
          & in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l25_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X59,X60] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X59,X60)
      | disjoint(X60,X59) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_r1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0)
    & in(esk4_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X43,X44,X45,X46,X47,X48,X49,X50] :
      ( ( in(X46,X43)
        | ~ in(X46,X45)
        | X45 != set_intersection2(X43,X44) )
      & ( in(X46,X44)
        | ~ in(X46,X45)
        | X45 != set_intersection2(X43,X44) )
      & ( ~ in(X47,X43)
        | ~ in(X47,X44)
        | in(X47,X45)
        | X45 != set_intersection2(X43,X44) )
      & ( ~ in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X50)
        | ~ in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X48)
        | ~ in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X49)
        | X50 = set_intersection2(X48,X49) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X48)
        | in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X50)
        | X50 = set_intersection2(X48,X49) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X49)
        | in(esk3_3(X48,X49,X50),X50)
        | X50 = set_intersection2(X48,X49) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X52,X53] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X52,X53)
        | set_intersection2(X52,X53) = empty_set )
      & ( set_intersection2(X52,X53) != empty_set
        | disjoint(X52,X53) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d7_xboole_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( disjoint(X2,X1)
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X39,X40,X41] :
      ( ( X39 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X40,X39) )
      & ( in(esk2_1(X41),X41)
        | X41 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X4 != set_intersection2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 != empty_set
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X32,X33,X34,X35,X36,X37] :
      ( ( ~ in(X34,X33)
        | X34 = X32
        | X33 != singleton(X32) )
      & ( X35 != X32
        | in(X35,X33)
        | X33 != singleton(X32) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X36,X37),X37)
        | esk1_2(X36,X37) != X36
        | X37 = singleton(X36) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X36,X37),X37)
        | esk1_2(X36,X37) = X36
        | X37 = singleton(X36) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ in(X1,empty_set),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,singleton(esk4_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk5_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU153+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:45:32 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------