%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU153+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.42s 2.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 16 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != singleton(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != set_intersection2(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_22,negated_conjecture,
in(esk4_0,esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_22) ).
cnf(i_0_16,plain,
( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_23,negated_conjecture,
disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( X1 != empty_set
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5vmcsv3x/input.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != singleton(X3) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != set_intersection2(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
in(esk4_0,esk5_0),
i_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != singleton(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk4_0,X1)
| X1 != set_intersection2(X2,esk5_0)
| ~ in(esk4_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
in(X1,singleton(X1)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
set_intersection2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = empty_set,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( X1 != empty_set
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
X1 != empty_set,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_37]),c_0_40]),c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_42]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU153+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 20:59:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.42/2.27 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.42/2.27 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.42/2.27 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.42/2.27 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d
% 7.42/2.27 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 7.42/2.27 #
% 7.42/2.27 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.42/2.27
% 7.42/2.27 # Proof found!
% 7.42/2.27 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.42/2.27 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.42/2.27 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.42/2.27
% 7.42/2.27 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.42/2.27 # User time : 0.012 s
% 7.42/2.27 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.42/2.27 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 7.42/2.27 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.42/2.27
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------