↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU153+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.79s 2.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   4 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_99,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ disjoint(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bairgs48/lgb.p',i_0_99) ).

cnf(i_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bairgs48/lgb.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X3
    | X2 != unordered_pair(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bairgs48/lgb.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_79,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bairgs48/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).

cnf(i_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0),esk10_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bairgs48/lgb.p',i_0_67) ).

cnf(c_0_105,lemma,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ disjoint(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_99 ).

cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X3
    | X2 != unordered_pair(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_79 ).

cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0),esk10_0),
    i_0_67 ).

cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk9_0,X1)
    | ~ disjoint(esk10_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_107])]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk10_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_109]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(esk10_0,unordered_pair(X1,esk9_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_113]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU153+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 15:12:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.79/2.24  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.79/2.24  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.79/2.24  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.79/2.24  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 4.79/2.24  # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 4.79/2.24  #
% 4.79/2.24  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 4.79/2.24  
% 4.79/2.24  # Proof found!
% 4.79/2.24  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.79/2.24  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.79/2.24  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.79/2.24  
% 4.79/2.24  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.79/2.24  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 4.79/2.24  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 4.79/2.24  # Total time               : 0.036 s
% 4.79/2.24  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 4.79/2.24  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------