↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU153+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.96s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   30 (  15   ~;   5   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   1 sgn  12   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l2_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(singleton(A),B)
    <=> in(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ ( disjoint(A,B)
          & ? [C] :
              ( in(C,B)
              & in(C,A) ) )
      & ~ ( ! [C] :
              ~ ( in(C,B)
                & in(C,A) )
          & ~ disjoint(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [A] : unordered_pair(A,A) = singleton(A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(l25_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ~ ( in(A,B)
        & disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l25_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l25_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ~ ( in(A,B)
          & disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l25_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_133,plain,
    ( in(A,B)
    | ~ subset(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l2_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    subset(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_163,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(B,C)
    | ~ in(A,C)
    | ~ in(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_176,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(nnf_74,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
      & disjoint(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l25_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_l25_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( in(sK0,sK1)
    & disjoint(singleton(sK0),sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_74]) ).

cnf(c_190,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(singleton(sK0),sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l25_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_190]) ).

cnf(c_192,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l25_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_234,plain,
    ( in(A,B)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(A,A),B) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_133]) ).

cnf(c_776,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(A,sK1)
    | ~ in(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_192,c_163]) ).

cnf(c_1352,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(A,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_234,c_142]) ).

cnf(c_1479,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_776,c_191]) ).

cnf(c_1478,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1352,c_1479]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU153+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:46:01 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 459196 was started by sandbox on n016,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 08:46:01 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.96/0.54  
% 0.96/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.96/0.54  
% 0.96/0.54  % Proof 1 at 0.08 (+ 0.03) seconds.
% 0.96/0.54  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.96/0.54  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.96/0.54  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 0.96/0.54  % Given clauses 145.
% 0.96/0.54  
% 0.96/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------