↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU154+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.98s 7.53s
% Output   : Refutation 3.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (  21 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  209 (   9   ~;   0   |;  17   &; 148   @)
%                                         (   7 <=>;  28  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0   ^;  57   !;   4   ?;  61   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(disjoint_decl,type,
    disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(empty_set_decl,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

thf(set_intersection2_decl,type,
    set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
    <=> ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
        = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
          = empty_set )
       => ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
       => ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
          = empty_set ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjoint ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
         => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

thf(82,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
           => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( A @ ( C @ in ) )
           => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C
        = ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) )
    <=> ! [D: $i] :
          ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
        <=> ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
            & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

thf(90,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) )
       => ( C
          = ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C
          = ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) )
       => ! [D: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) )
             => ( C @ ( D @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( C @ ( D @ in ) )
             => ( ( B @ ( D @ in ) )
                & ( A @ ( D @ in ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B
        = ( A @ singleton ) )
    <=> ! [C: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
        <=> ( C = A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C = A )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( C = A ) ) )
       => ( B
          = ( A @ singleton ) ) )
      & ( ( B
          = ( A @ singleton ) )
       => ! [C: $i] :
            ( ( ( C = A )
             => ( B @ ( C @ in ) ) )
            & ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( C = A ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    empty_set @ empty,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(38,plain,
    empty_set @ empty,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( empty_set @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_xboole_1) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( empty_set @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l28_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ~ ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ singleton @ disjoint ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A = B )
    <=> ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
       => ( A = B ) )
      & ( ( A = B )
       => ( ( A @ ( B @ subset ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(120,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[42,49,39,80,82,47,90,57,78,38,21,45,17,26,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU154+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/5.39  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/5.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:41:07 UTC 2026
% 0.13/5.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/5.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.17/5.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.24/6.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (187ms). 
% 1.24/6.19  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.02/6.60  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.02/6.61  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.18/6.70  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 17 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.18/6.76  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 14 axioms (removed 3 axioms). 
% 2.18/6.79  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.18/6.79  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.36/6.80  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.98/7.52  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.98/7.52  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.98/7.52  % Time passed: 1985ms (effective reasoning time: 1326ms)
% 3.98/7.52  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.98/7.53  % Axioms used in derivation (14): d1_tarski, idempotence_k3_xboole_0, fc1_xboole_0, commutativity_k3_xboole_0, d7_xboole_0, t2_xboole_1, rc1_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, d10_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, d3_tarski, reflexivity_r1_tarski, d3_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 3.98/7.53  % No. of inferences in proof: 32
% 3.98/7.53  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1985 ms resp. 1326 ms w/o parsing
% 3.98/7.58  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.98/7.58  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------