↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU155+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:41:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 36.21s 4.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 36.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU155+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:44:44 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 36.21/4.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 36.21/4.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 36.21/4.82  fof(d3_tarski, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((subset(X0,X1) <=> ! [X2] : ((in(X2,X0) => in(X2,X1)))))).
% 36.21/4.82  fof(d4_tarski, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((X1 = union(X0) <=> ! [X2] : ((in(X2,X1) <=> ? [X3] : ((in(X2,X3) & in(X3,X0)))))))).
% 36.21/4.82  fof(l50_zfmisc_1, conjecture, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((in(X0,X1) => subset(X0,union(X1))))).
% 36.21/4.82  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ! [X1] : ((in(X0,X1) => subset(X0,union(X1)))), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [l50_zfmisc_1])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(c45, plain, subset(X0,X1) | in(sK38(X0,X1),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_tarski])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(c46, plain, subset(X0,X1) | ~in(sK38(X0,X1),X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d3_tarski])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(c58, plain, X0 != union(X1) | X2(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d4_tarski])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(c62, plain, ~X0(X1,X2) | in(X3,X2) | ~in(X3,X4) | ~in(X4,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [d4_tarski])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(c151, plain, in(sK173,sK174), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(c152, plain, ~subset(sK173,union(sK174)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(d0, plain, 'Ts45'(X0,union(X0)), inference(equality_resolution, [status(thm)], [c58])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(d1, plain, ~in(X0,X1) | in(X2,union(X1)) | ~in(X2,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c62,d0])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(d2, plain, ~in(X0,sK173) | in(X0,union(sK174)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d1,c151])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(d3, plain, ~in(sK38(X0,union(sK174)),sK173) | subset(X0,union(sK174)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d2,c46])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(d4, plain, subset(sK173,union(sK174)) | subset(sK173,union(sK174)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c45])).
% 36.21/4.82  cnf(d5, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c152,d4])).
% 36.21/4.82  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------