↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU157+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  116 (  46 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  59   ~;  65   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  105 (  16 sgn  32   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t33_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ordered_pair(X1,X2) = ordered_pair(X3,X4)
     => ( X1 = X3
        & X2 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t33_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d2_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ? [X5,X6] :
              ( in(X5,X1)
              & in(X6,X2)
              & X4 = ordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l55_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( X5 = X7
        | ordered_pair(X5,X6) != ordered_pair(X7,X8) )
      & ( X6 = X8
        | ordered_pair(X5,X6) != ordered_pair(X7,X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t33_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X10,X13,X14,X7,X8,X9,X16,X17] :
      ( ( in(esk5_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),X7)
        | ~ in(X10,X9)
        | X9 != cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( in(esk6_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),X8)
        | ~ in(X10,X9)
        | X9 != cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( X10 = ordered_pair(esk5_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),esk6_4(X7,X8,X9,X10))
        | ~ in(X10,X9)
        | X9 != cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ in(X13,X7)
        | ~ in(X14,X8)
        | X10 != ordered_pair(X13,X14)
        | in(X10,X9)
        | X9 != cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( ~ in(esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),X9)
        | ~ in(X16,X7)
        | ~ in(X17,X8)
        | esk7_3(X7,X8,X9) != ordered_pair(X16,X17)
        | X9 = cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( in(esk8_3(X7,X8,X9),X7)
        | in(esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),X9)
        | X9 = cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( in(esk9_3(X7,X8,X9),X8)
        | in(esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),X9)
        | X9 = cartesian_product2(X7,X8) )
      & ( esk7_3(X7,X8,X9) = ordered_pair(esk8_3(X7,X8,X9),esk9_3(X7,X8,X9))
        | in(esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),X9)
        | X9 = cartesian_product2(X7,X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_zfmisc_1])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( X2 = X4
    | ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( X4 = ordered_pair(esk5_4(X2,X3,X1,X4),esk6_4(X2,X3,X1,X4))
    | X1 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = esk6_4(X2,X3,X4,X5)
    | ordered_pair(X6,X1) != X5
    | X4 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
      <=> ( in(X1,X3)
          & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l55_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X4,X1)
    | X1 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3)
    | X4 != ordered_pair(X5,X6)
    | ~ in(X6,X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(esk6_4(X2,X3,X1,X4),X3)
    | X1 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( esk6_4(X1,X2,X3,ordered_pair(X4,X5)) = X5
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
      | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0) )
    & ( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) )
    & ( in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
      | in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X4,X5)
    | ~ in(X2,X5)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X1),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | in(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ordered_pair(X1,X2) != ordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | in(esk2_0,X1)
    | cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0) != cartesian_product2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = esk5_4(X2,X3,X4,X5)
    | ordered_pair(X1,X6) != X5
    | X4 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(esk5_4(X2,X3,X1,X4),X2)
    | X1 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( esk5_4(X1,X2,X3,ordered_pair(X4,X5)) = X4
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != cartesian_product2(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,X1)
    | cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0) != cartesian_product2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU157+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:45:23 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 31
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 24
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 13
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 13
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.21/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.21/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 58
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.21/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 52
% 0.21/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.21/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 116
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 104
% 0.21/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.21/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 97
% 0.21/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 18
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 39
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 59
% 0.21/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 278
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.21/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 417
% 0.21/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 196
% 0.21/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.21/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.21/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2449
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.21/1.40  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 2776 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------