%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU158+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:16 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 10 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 2 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t37_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
<=> in(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t37_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(l2_zfmisc_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
<=> in(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l2_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
<=> in(X1,X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t37_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ subset(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0) )
& ( subset(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0)
| in(esk1_0,esk2_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,lemma,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ subset(singleton(X3),X4)
| in(X3,X4) )
& ( ~ in(X3,X4)
| subset(singleton(X3),X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l2_zfmisc_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| ~ subset(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,lemma,
( subset(singleton(X1),X2)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
| subset(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(singleton(X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
subset(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,lemma,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SEU158+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:56:45 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.45
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 88
% 0.24/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37
% 0.24/1.45 # Initial clauses : 86
% 0.24/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.24/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.24/1.45 # Processed clauses : 87
% 0.24/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.24/1.45 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.24/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 81
% 0.24/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 20
% 0.24/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/1.45 # Generated clauses : 422
% 0.24/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 322
% 0.24/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # Paramodulations : 379
% 0.24/1.45 # Factorizations : 14
% 0.24/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 28
% 0.24/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 76
% 0.24/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.24/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.24/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 60
% 0.24/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 312
% 0.24/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 813
% 0.24/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.24/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 490
% 0.24/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 358
% 0.24/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.24/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.24/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 20
% 0.24/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 0.24/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8205
% 0.24/1.45
% 0.24/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.45 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.24/1.45 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.45 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.24/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 3420 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------