↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU158+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:55:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.87s 1.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  27   ~;  24   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  26   !;   4   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f41,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
    <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f67,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
    <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f68,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
      <=> in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f67]) ).

fof(f80,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
    <~> in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(singleton(X0),X1)
        | in(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ in(X0,X1)
        | subset(singleton(X0),X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(singleton(X0),X1)
        | in(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ subset(singleton(X0),X1)
        | ~ in(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ( ( subset(singleton(sK19),sK20)
      | in(sK19,sK20) )
    & ( ~ subset(singleton(sK19),sK20)
      | ~ in(sK19,sK20) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK19,sK20]),skolemize(X0,sK19),skolemize(X1,sK20)],[f186]) ).

fof(f265,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(singleton(X0),X1)
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f175]) ).

fof(f266,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | subset(singleton(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f175]) ).

fof(f300,plain,
    ( subset(singleton(sK19),sK20)
    | in(sK19,sK20) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).

fof(f301,plain,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(sK19),sK20)
    | ~ in(sK19,sK20) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).

fof(f316,plain,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f351,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f266,f316]) ).

fof(f352,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1)
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f265,f316]) ).

fof(f368,plain,
    ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20)
    | ~ in(sK19,sK20) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f301,f316]) ).

fof(f369,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20)
    | in(sK19,sK20) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f300,f316]) ).

tcf(c_122,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f351]) ).

tcf(c_123,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f352]) ).

tcf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK19,sK20)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f368]) ).

tcf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK19,sK20)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f369]) ).

tcf(c_258,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1)
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_123]) ).

tcf(c_259,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X0,X0),X1) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_258]) ).

tcf(c_266,plain,
    ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20)
    | ~ in(sK19,sK20) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_157]) ).

tcf(c_267,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK19,sK20)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_266]) ).

tcf(c_268,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20)
    | in(sK19,sK20) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_158]) ).

tcf(c_269,plain,
    ( in(sK19,sK20)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_268]) ).

tcf(c_723,plain,
    in(sK19,sK20),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_259]) ).

tcf(c_727,plain,
    ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK19,sK19),sK20),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_267,c_723]) ).

tcf(c_5453,plain,
    ~ in(sK19,sK20),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_122,c_727]) ).

tcf(c_5457,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5453,c_723]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU158+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:04:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.45  % Proving...
% 3.87/1.32  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.87/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.87/1.32  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.87/1.32  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 5  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Proving...
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % 
% 3.87/1.32  % clauses                               121
% 3.87/1.32  % conjectures                           0
% 3.87/1.32  % EPR                                   22
% 3.87/1.32  % Horn                                  93
% 3.87/1.32  % unary                                 26
% 3.87/1.32  % binary                                52
% 3.87/1.32  % lits                                  266
% 3.87/1.32  % lits eq                               78
% 3.87/1.32  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.87/1.32  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.87/1.32  % fd_cond                               3
% 3.87/1.32  % fd_pseudo_cond                        35
% 3.87/1.32  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ 
% 3.87/1.32  % Current options:
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % ------ Proving...
% 3.87/1.32  % 
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.87/1.32  
% 3.87/1.32  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------