↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU159+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.90s 1.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  122 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  123 (  47   ~;  56   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   4 sgn  28   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( C = unordered_pair(A,B)
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( D = B
            | D = A ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t38_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    <=> ( in(B,C)
        & in(A,C) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t38_zfmisc_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
      <=> ( in(B,C)
          & in(A,C) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( D = B
    | D = A
    | ~ in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( D != A
    | in(D,C)
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != C ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ? [C] :
            ( ~ in(C,B)
            & in(C,A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski_sk,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
          & in(sK0(A,B),A) )
        | subset(A,B) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(X0,B)
            | ~ in(X0,A) )
        | ~ subset(A,B) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(C,sK0(A,B))],[nnf_4]) ).

fof(sk_d3_tarski,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subset(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski_sk]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( in(C,B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( in(sK0(A,B),A)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK0(A,B),B)
    | subset(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d3_tarski]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] :
      ( ( ~ in(B,C)
        | ~ in(A,C)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) )
      & ( ( in(B,C)
          & in(A,C) )
        | subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t38_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t38_zfmisc_1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
      | ~ in(sK1,sK3)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) )
    & ( ( in(sK2,sK3)
        & in(sK1,sK3) )
      | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK2),skolemize(C,sK3)],[nnf_7]) ).

fof(sk_t38_zfmisc_1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
      | ~ in(sK1,sK3)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) )
    & ( in(sK2,sK3)
      | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) )
    & ( in(sK1,sK3)
      | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_t38_zfmisc_1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK1,sK3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t38_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK2,sK3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t38_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ in(sK1,sK3)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t38_zfmisc_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    ( A = B
    | A = C
    | ~ in(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    ( A != C
    | in(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( in(A,sK3)
    | ~ in(A,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2))
    | in(sK1,sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2))
    | in(sK1,sK3) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( in(A,sK3)
    | ~ in(A,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2))
    | in(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK2,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2))
    | in(sK2,sK3) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_102,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    | sK0(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = A
    | sK0(unordered_pair(A,B),C) = B ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_143,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(B,A)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

cnf(c_145,plain,
    in(sK2,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_63]) ).

cnf(c_150,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK3)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_186,plain,
    in(A,unordered_pair(A,B)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_143]) ).

cnf(c_190,plain,
    in(sK1,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_190,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_300,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3),sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_191]) ).

cnf(c_3147,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3)
    | sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) = sK1 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_300]) ).

cnf(c_3148,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK2,sK3)
    | sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) = sK1 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_191,c_3147]) ).

cnf(c_3089,negated_conjecture,
    sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) = sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_3148]) ).

cnf(c_3149,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3)
    | sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3) = sK2 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_300]) ).

cnf(c_3150,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3)
    | sK1 = sK2 ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3089,c_3149]) ).

cnf(c_3151,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),sK3)
    | sK2 = sK1 ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_3150]) ).

cnf(c_3152,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(sK1,sK3)
    | sK2 = sK1 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_191,c_3151]) ).

cnf(c_3090,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK1,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_190,c_3152]) ).

cnf(c_3123,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1),sK3),sK3),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3090,c_300]) ).

cnf(c_3125,negated_conjecture,
    sK0(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1),sK3) = sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3090,c_3089]) ).

cnf(c_3153,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK1,sK3),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_3125,c_3123]) ).

cnf(c_3146,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_190,c_3153]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU159+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:47:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.33  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.33  % Process 1402972 was started by sandbox on n001,
% 0.09/0.33  % Sat Sep 26 08:47:42 2026
% 0.09/0.33  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.34  
% 0.09/0.34  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 9.90/1.63  
% 9.90/1.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 9.90/1.63  
% 9.90/1.63  % Proof 1 at 0.81 (+ 0.33) seconds.
% 9.90/1.63  % Length of proof is 32.
% 9.90/1.63  % Level of proof is 11.
% 9.90/1.63  % Maximum clause weight is 25.000.
% 9.90/1.63  % Given clauses 228.
% 9.90/1.63  
% 9.90/1.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------