↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU159+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.46s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  35   ~;  44   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   6 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( X4 = X1
            | X4 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t38_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X218,X219,X220,X221,X222,X223,X224,X225] :
      ( ( ~ in(X221,X220)
        | X221 = X218
        | X221 = X219
        | X220 != unordered_pair(X218,X219) )
      & ( X222 != X218
        | in(X222,X220)
        | X220 != unordered_pair(X218,X219) )
      & ( X222 != X219
        | in(X222,X220)
        | X220 != unordered_pair(X218,X219) )
      & ( esk4_3(X223,X224,X225) != X223
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X223,X224,X225),X225)
        | X225 = unordered_pair(X223,X224) )
      & ( esk4_3(X223,X224,X225) != X224
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X223,X224,X225),X225)
        | X225 = unordered_pair(X223,X224) )
      & ( in(esk4_3(X223,X224,X225),X225)
        | esk4_3(X223,X224,X225) = X223
        | esk4_3(X223,X224,X225) = X224
        | X225 = unordered_pair(X223,X224) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X253,X254,X255,X256,X257] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X253,X254)
        | ~ in(X255,X253)
        | in(X255,X254) )
      & ( in(esk11_2(X256,X257),X256)
        | subset(X256,X257) )
      & ( ~ in(esk11_2(X256,X257),X257)
        | subset(X256,X257) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != unordered_pair(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
      <=> ( in(X1,X3)
          & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( in(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0)
      | ~ in(esk20_0,esk22_0)
      | ~ in(esk21_0,esk22_0) )
    & ( in(esk20_0,esk22_0)
      | subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) )
    & ( in(esk21_0,esk22_0)
      | subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != unordered_pair(X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X3,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk21_0,esk22_0)
    | subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0)
    | ~ in(esk20_0,esk22_0)
    | ~ in(esk21_0,esk22_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk21_0,esk22_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk20_0,esk22_0)
    | subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0)
    | ~ in(esk20_0,esk22_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk20_0,esk22_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | X1 = X4
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk11_2(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0),unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk11_2(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) = esk21_0
    | esk11_2(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) = esk20_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    esk11_2(unordered_pair(esk20_0,esk21_0),esk22_0) = esk20_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_15])]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_27]),c_0_19])]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem    : SEU159+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.06/0.25  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.25  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:46:16 EDT 2026
% 0.06/0.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.06/0.26  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.46/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.46/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.46/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.46/1.72  % Total time : 1.362s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------