↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU159+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  29 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  38   ~;  51   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   4 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t38_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    <=> ( in(X2,X3)
        & in(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( X4 = X2
            | X4 = X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
      <=> ( in(X2,X3)
          & in(X1,X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X21,X22,X23] :
      ( ( subset(X22,X23)
        | ~ in(esk5_2(X22,X23),X23) )
      & ( subset(X22,X23)
        | in(esk5_2(X22,X23),X22) )
      & ( in(X21,X20)
        | ~ in(X21,X19)
        | ~ subset(X19,X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
      | in(esk2_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
      | in(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( ~ in(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( X17 = unordered_pair(X15,X16)
        | esk4_3(X15,X16,X17) = X16
        | esk4_3(X15,X16,X17) = X15
        | in(esk4_3(X15,X16,X17),X17) )
      & ( X17 = unordered_pair(X15,X16)
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X15,X16,X17),X17)
        | esk4_3(X15,X16,X17) != X16 )
      & ( X17 = unordered_pair(X15,X16)
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X15,X16,X17),X17)
        | esk4_3(X15,X16,X17) != X15 )
      & ( X12 != unordered_pair(X10,X11)
        | in(X14,X12)
        | X14 != X11 )
      & ( X12 != unordered_pair(X10,X11)
        | in(X14,X12)
        | X14 != X10 )
      & ( X12 != unordered_pair(X10,X11)
        | X13 = X11
        | X13 = X10
        | ~ in(X13,X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
    | in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X3 != unordered_pair(X2,X4)
    | X1 != X2
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X4
    | X1 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | in(X1,esk3_0)
    | in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
    | in(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X3 != unordered_pair(X4,X2)
    | X1 != X2
    | in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(X3,X2))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | in(X1,esk3_0)
    | in(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | esk5_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X2
    | esk5_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | esk5_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_18]),c_0_24])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU159+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:55:43 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % new_bool_3 with pid 1116181 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.56  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1116186 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.56  % Search class: FGHSS-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.24/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.24/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.24/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.24/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 52
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.24/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.24/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 36
% 0.24/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 25
% 0.24/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.24/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 121
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 82
% 0.24/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 84
% 0.24/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 14
% 0.24/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 25
% 0.24/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 24
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 15
% 0.24/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 27
% 0.24/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.24/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.24/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.24/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41
% 0.24/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 166
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.24/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 75
% 0.24/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 72
% 0.24/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 9
% 0.24/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.24/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.24/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.24/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2134
% 0.24/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 314
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------