↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SEU160+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:01:25 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.53s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SEU160+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 16:21:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.53/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.53/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.53/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.53/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.53/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.60  % File     : SEU160+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.53/0.60  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.53/0.60  % Problem  : MPTP bushy problem t39_zfmisc_1
% 0.53/0.60  % Version  : [Urb07] axioms : Especial.
% 0.53/0.60  % English  :
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Refs     : [Ban01] Bancerek et al. (2001), On the Characterizations of Co
% 0.53/0.60  %          : [Urb07] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.53/0.60  % Source   : [Urb07]
% 0.53/0.60  % Names    : bushy-t39_zfmisc_1 [Urb07]
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.53/0.60  % Rating   : 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.08 v6.1.0, 0.13 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.4.0, 0.14 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.04 v4.0.1, 0.09 v4.0.0, 0.12 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.11 v3.3.0
% 0.53/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   12 (   4 equ)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   1   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
% 0.53/0.60  %                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.53/0.60  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   6   !;   2   ?)
% 0.53/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.53/0.60  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.53/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.61  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      ! [A,B] : subset(A,A) ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(dt_k1_tarski,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      $true ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(dt_k1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      $true ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(t39_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.53/0.61      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.61        ( subset(A,singleton(B))
% 0.53/0.61      <=> ( A = empty_set
% 0.53/0.61          | A = singleton(B) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  fof(l4_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.53/0.61      ! [A,B] :
% 0.53/0.61        ( subset(A,singleton(B))
% 0.53/0.61      <=> ( A = empty_set
% 0.53/0.61          | A = singleton(B) ) ) ).
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.53/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.53/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.53/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.53/0.61  %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:7)
% 0.53/0.61  %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:7)
% 0.53/0.61  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.53/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.53/0.61  %SharedTerms:15
% 0.53/0.61  %goalClause: 12 14 16
% 0.53/0.61  [8]P1(a1)
% 0.53/0.61  [9]P1(a2)
% 0.53/0.61  [11]~P1(a3)
% 0.53/0.61  [10]P2(x101,x101)
% 0.53/0.61  [14]~E(a1,a4)+~P2(a4,f6(a5))
% 0.53/0.61  [16]~P2(a4,f6(a5))+~E(f6(a5),a4)
% 0.53/0.61  [13]~E(x131,a1)+P2(x131,f6(x132))
% 0.53/0.61  [15]P2(x151,f6(x152))+~E(x151,f6(x152))
% 0.53/0.61  [12]E(a1,a4)+E(f6(a5),a4)+P2(a4,f6(a5))
% 0.53/0.61  [17]E(x171,a1)+E(x171,f6(x172))+~P2(x171,f6(x172))
% 0.53/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.53/0.61  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.53/0.61  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.53/0.61  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.53/0.61  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f6(x41),f6(x42))
% 0.53/0.61  [5]~P1(x51)+P1(x52)+~E(x51,x52)
% 0.53/0.61  [6]P2(x62,x63)+~E(x61,x62)+~P2(x61,x63)
% 0.53/0.61  [7]P2(x73,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P2(x73,x71)
% 0.53/0.61  
% 0.53/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (P2(a1,f6(x181))),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(equality_inference,[],[13])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~E(f6(a5),a4)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,6,14,16])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (E(a1,a4)+P2(a4,f6(a5))),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,12])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~E(a1,a4)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,6,14])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (P2(a4,f6(a5))),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,26])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(43,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (E(a4,f6(a5))),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,35,2,17])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(44,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     ($false),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,43,2]),
% 0.56/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.61  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------