↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU160+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:37:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.17s 6.66s
% Output   : Refutation 3.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   21
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  170 (  89 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  325 (  60   ~;  75   |;  10   &; 165   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   8 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   0   ^;  48   !;   0   ?;  52   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   4  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

thf(empty_set_decl,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $o ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: $i ).

thf(sk4_decl,type,
    sk4: $i ).

thf(sk5_decl,type,
    sk5: $i ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
             => ( ( A
                  = ( B @ singleton ) )
                | ( A = empty_set ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( A @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ) )
           => ( ( sk2
                = ( A @ singleton ) )
              | ( sk2 = empty_set ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk4_def,definition,
    ( sk4
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( ( A
                  = ( B @ singleton ) )
                | ( A = empty_set ) )
             => ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk5_def,definition,
    ( sk5
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( ( sk4
                = ( A @ singleton ) )
              | ( sk4 = empty_set ) )
           => ( A @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
    <=> ( ( A
          = ( B @ singleton ) )
        | ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
      <=> ( ( A
            = ( B @ singleton ) )
          | ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( ( A
              = ( B @ singleton ) )
            | ( A = empty_set ) )
         => ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
        & ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
         => ( ( A
              = ( B @ singleton ) )
            | ( A = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( ( A
              = ( B @ singleton ) )
            | ( A = empty_set ) )
         => ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
         => ( ( A
              = ( B @ singleton ) )
            | ( A = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ( ~ ( sk5 @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) )
      | sk1 )
    & ( ( sk4
        = ( sk5 @ singleton ) )
      | ( sk4 = empty_set )
      | sk1 )
    & ( ~ sk1
      | ( sk2
       != ( sk3 @ singleton ) ) )
    & ( ~ sk1
      | ( sk2 != empty_set ) )
    & ( ~ sk1
      | ( sk3 @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( ~ sk1
    | ( sk3 @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( sk4
      = ( sk5 @ singleton ) )
    | ( sk4 = empty_set )
    | sk1 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( sk1
    | ( ( sk5 @ singleton )
      = sk4 )
    | ( sk4 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[26]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ~ ( sk5 @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) )
    | sk1 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(60,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ subset ) )
       != ( sk5 @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | sk1 ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[27,16]) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( A @ subset ) )
       != ( sk5 @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) ) )
      | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A
       != ( sk5 @ singleton ) )
      | ( A != sk4 )
      | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ( ( ( sk5 @ singleton )
     != sk4 )
    | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

thf(65,plain,
    ( ( ( sk5 @ singleton )
     != ( sk5 @ singleton ) )
    | ( sk4 != sk4 )
    | sk1
    | sk1
    | ( sk4 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[18,63]) ).

thf(66,plain,
    ( ( ( sk5 @ singleton )
     != ( sk5 @ singleton ) )
    | sk1
    | ( sk4 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ( sk1
    | ( sk4 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[66:[]]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
    <=> ( ( A
          = ( B @ singleton ) )
        | ( A = empty_set ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A
            = ( B @ singleton ) )
          | ( A = empty_set ) )
       => ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
       => ( ( A
            = ( B @ singleton ) )
          | ( A = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( A
            = ( B @ singleton ) )
          | ( A = empty_set ) )
       => ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
    & ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
       => ( ( A
            = ( B @ singleton ) )
          | ( A = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ subset ) )
        | ( C
         != ( D @ singleton ) ) )
      & ( ( D @ singleton @ ( C @ subset ) )
        | ( C != empty_set ) )
      & ( ( A
          = ( B @ singleton ) )
        | ( A = empty_set )
        | ~ ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[32]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
      | ( A != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
      | ( A != empty_set ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ singleton @ ( empty_set @ subset ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ singleton @ ( empty_set @ subset ) )
       != ( sk5 @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | sk1 ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[39,16]) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ singleton @ ( empty_set @ subset ) )
       != ( sk5 @ singleton @ ( sk4 @ subset ) ) )
      | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[57]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ singleton )
       != ( sk5 @ singleton ) )
      | ( sk4 != empty_set )
      | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[58]) ).

thf(68,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A != sk5 )
      | ( sk4 != empty_set )
      | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ( ( sk4 != empty_set )
    | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[68]) ).

thf(76,plain,
    ( ( sk4 != sk4 )
    | ( empty_set != empty_set )
    | sk1
    | sk1 ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[67,75]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ( ( sk4 != sk4 )
    | sk1 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[76]) ).

thf(78,plain,
    sk1,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[77:[]]) ).

thf(86,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( sk3 @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[15,78]) ).

thf(87,plain,
    sk3 @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[86]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A
        = ( B @ singleton ) )
      | ( A = empty_set )
      | ~ ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) )
      | ( A
        = ( B @ singleton ) )
      | ( A = empty_set ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(119,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ) )
       != ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( A
        = ( B @ singleton ) )
      | ( A = empty_set ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[87,37]) ).

thf(120,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk3 @ singleton @ ( sk2 @ subset ) )
       != ( B @ singleton @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
      | ( A
        = ( B @ singleton ) )
      | ( A = empty_set ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[119]) ).

thf(121,plain,
    ( ( ( sk3 @ singleton )
      = sk2 )
    | ( sk2 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[120:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 )),bind(B,$thf( sk3 ))]]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ~ sk1
    | ( sk2
     != ( sk3 @ singleton ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ( ~ sk1
    | ( ( sk3 @ singleton )
     != sk2 ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(82,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( ( sk3 @ singleton )
     != sk2 ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[20,78]) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ( ( sk3 @ singleton )
   != sk2 ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[82]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ~ sk1
    | ( sk2 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ~ sk1
    | ( sk2 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ( ~ $true
    | ( sk2 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[19,78]) ).

thf(85,plain,
    sk2 != empty_set,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[84]) ).

thf(131,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[121,83,85]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU160+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.12/5.39  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/5.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:40:29 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/5.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/5.77  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.16/5.86  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (86ms). 
% 0.16/5.87  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.32/6.05  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.32/6.05  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.32/6.09  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.32/6.11  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.32/6.12  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 1.32/6.12  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.32/6.12  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.17/6.66  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.17/6.66  % Time passed: 1119ms (effective reasoning time: 789ms)
% 3.17/6.66  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.17/6.66  % Axioms used in derivation (2): reflexivity_r1_tarski, l4_zfmisc_1
% 3.17/6.66  % No. of inferences in proof: 50
% 3.17/6.66  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1119 ms resp. 789 ms w/o parsing
% 3.58/6.70  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.58/6.70  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------