↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU160+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.31s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  32 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  18   ~;  24   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn  15   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t39_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l4_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(t2_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : subset(empty_set,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
      <=> ( X1 = empty_set
          | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t39_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,lemma,
    ! [X319,X320] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X319,singleton(X320))
        | X319 = empty_set
        | X319 = singleton(X320) )
      & ( X319 != empty_set
        | subset(X319,singleton(X320)) )
      & ( X319 != singleton(X320)
        | subset(X319,singleton(X320)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l4_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,lemma,
    ! [X403] : unordered_pair(X403,X403) = singleton(X403),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk20_0 != empty_set
      | ~ subset(esk20_0,singleton(esk21_0)) )
    & ( esk20_0 != singleton(esk21_0)
      | ~ subset(esk20_0,singleton(esk21_0)) )
    & ( subset(esk20_0,singleton(esk21_0))
      | esk20_0 = empty_set
      | esk20_0 = singleton(esk21_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk20_0,singleton(esk21_0))
    | esk20_0 = empty_set
    | esk20_0 = singleton(esk21_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk20_0 != singleton(esk21_0)
    | ~ subset(esk20_0,singleton(esk21_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = unordered_pair(X2,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk20_0 = empty_set
    | esk20_0 = unordered_pair(esk21_0,esk21_0)
    | subset(esk20_0,unordered_pair(esk21_0,esk21_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X329] : subset(X329,X329),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk20_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk20_0,singleton(esk21_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk20_0 != unordered_pair(esk21_0,esk21_0)
    | ~ subset(esk20_0,unordered_pair(esk21_0,esk21_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(esk21_0,esk21_0) = esk20_0
    | esk20_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,lemma,
    ! [X356] : subset(empty_set,X356),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk20_0 != empty_set
    | ~ subset(esk20_0,unordered_pair(esk21_0,esk21_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    esk20_0 = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
    subset(empty_set,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU160+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:46:36 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.31/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.31/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.31/1.73  % Total time : 1.374s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------