↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:40:43 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SEU160+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed May  8 11:14:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.54  % Version:  1.5
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.54  fof(l4_zfmisc_1,axiom,(![A]:(![B]:(subset(A,singleton(B))<=>(A=empty_set|A=singleton(B))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', l4_zfmisc_1)).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c3,plain,(![A]:(![B]:((~subset(A,singleton(B))|(A=empty_set|A=singleton(B)))&((A!=empty_set&A!=singleton(B))|subset(A,singleton(B)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l4_zfmisc_1])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c4,plain,((![A]:(![B]:(~subset(A,singleton(B))|(A=empty_set|A=singleton(B)))))&(![A]:(![B]:((A!=empty_set&A!=singleton(B))|subset(A,singleton(B)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c6,plain,(![X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:(![X5]:((~subset(X2,singleton(X3))|(X2=empty_set|X2=singleton(X3)))&((X4!=empty_set&X4!=singleton(X5))|subset(X4,singleton(X5)))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c5,plain,((![X2]:(![X3]:(~subset(X2,singleton(X3))|(X2=empty_set|X2=singleton(X3)))))&(![X4]:(![X5]:((X4!=empty_set&X4!=singleton(X5))|subset(X4,singleton(X5)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c4])).])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c7,plain,(![X2]:(![X3]:(![X4]:(![X5]:((~subset(X2,singleton(X3))|(X2=empty_set|X2=singleton(X3)))&((X4!=empty_set|subset(X4,singleton(X5)))&(X4!=singleton(X5)|subset(X4,singleton(X5))))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c10,plain,X32!=singleton(X31)|subset(X32,singleton(X31)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(t39_zfmisc_1,conjecture,(![A]:(![B]:(subset(A,singleton(B))<=>(A=empty_set|A=singleton(B))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', t39_zfmisc_1)).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c11,negated_conjecture,(~(![A]:(![B]:(subset(A,singleton(B))<=>(A=empty_set|A=singleton(B)))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t39_zfmisc_1])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c12,negated_conjecture,(?[A]:(?[B]:((~subset(A,singleton(B))|(A!=empty_set&A!=singleton(B)))&(subset(A,singleton(B))|(A=empty_set|A=singleton(B)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c11])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c13,negated_conjecture,(?[X6]:(?[X7]:((~subset(X6,singleton(X7))|(X6!=empty_set&X6!=singleton(X7)))&(subset(X6,singleton(X7))|(X6=empty_set|X6=singleton(X7)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c12])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c14,negated_conjecture,((~subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|(skolem0001!=empty_set&skolem0001!=singleton(skolem0002)))&(subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|(skolem0001=empty_set|skolem0001=singleton(skolem0002)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c13])).
% 0.19/0.54  fof(c15,negated_conjecture,(((~subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|skolem0001!=empty_set)&(~subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|skolem0001!=singleton(skolem0002)))&(subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|(skolem0001=empty_set|skolem0001=singleton(skolem0002)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c18,negated_conjecture,subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|skolem0001=empty_set|skolem0001=singleton(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c60,plain,subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|skolem0001=empty_set,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c18, c10])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c17,negated_conjecture,~subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|skolem0001!=singleton(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c8,plain,~subset(X46,singleton(X47))|X46=empty_set|X46=singleton(X47),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c48,plain,skolem0001=empty_set|skolem0001=singleton(skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c18, c8])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c74,plain,skolem0001=empty_set|~subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c48, c17])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c127,plain,skolem0001=empty_set,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c74, c60])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c16,negated_conjecture,~subset(skolem0001,singleton(skolem0002))|skolem0001!=empty_set,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c9,plain,X20!=empty_set|subset(X20,singleton(X19)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c128,plain,subset(skolem0001,singleton(X58)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c127, c9])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c144,plain,skolem0001!=empty_set,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c128, c16])).
% 0.19/0.54  cnf(c147,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c144, c127])).
% 0.19/0.54  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.19/0.54  
% 0.19/0.54  % Initial clauses    : 16
% 0.19/0.54  % Processed clauses  : 33
% 0.19/0.54  % Factors computed   : 2
% 0.19/0.54  % Resolvents computed: 116
% 0.19/0.54  % Tautologies deleted: 5
% 0.19/0.54  % Forward subsumed   : 11
% 0.19/0.54  % Backward subsumed  : 8
% 0.19/0.54  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.19/0.54  % User time          : 0.181 s
% 0.19/0.54  % System time        : 0.015 s
% 0.19/0.54  % Total time         : 0.196 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------