%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU161+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:21:55 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.05s
% Output : Solution 1.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14734/SEU161+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14734/SEU161+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14734/SEU161+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 14830
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:set_union2(X1,X2)=set_union2(X2,X1),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', commutativity_k2_xboole_0)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(in(X1,X2)=>set_union2(singleton(X1),X2)=X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', l23_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(7, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:(in(X1,X2)=>set_union2(singleton(X1),X2)=X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t46_zfmisc_1)).
% fof(8, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:(in(X1,X2)=>set_union2(singleton(X1),X2)=X2)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7])).
% fof(10, plain,![X3]:![X4]:set_union2(X3,X4)=set_union2(X4,X3),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(11,plain,(set_union2(X1,X2)=set_union2(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(17, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(in(X1,X2))|set_union2(singleton(X1),X2)=X2),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(18, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(in(X3,X4))|set_union2(singleton(X3),X4)=X4),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(19,plain,(set_union2(singleton(X1),X2)=X2|~in(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(22, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:(in(X1,X2)&~(set_union2(singleton(X1),X2)=X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8])).
% fof(23, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:(in(X3,X4)&~(set_union2(singleton(X3),X4)=X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, negated_conjecture,(in(esk1_0,esk2_0)&~(set_union2(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0)=esk2_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[23])).
% cnf(25,negated_conjecture,(set_union2(singleton(esk1_0),esk2_0)!=esk2_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% cnf(26,negated_conjecture,(in(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[24])).
% cnf(27,negated_conjecture,(set_union2(esk2_0,singleton(esk1_0))!=esk2_0),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[25,11,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(32,plain,(X2=set_union2(X2,singleton(X1))|~in(X1,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[11,19,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(35,negated_conjecture,(~in(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,32,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(39,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[35,26,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(40,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[39,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(41,negated_conjecture,($false),40,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 14
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 14
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 1
% # Generated clauses : 9
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 9
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 7
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 2
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% # Negative unit clauses : 1
% # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 8
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 8
% # Backwards rewriting index: 11 leaves, 1.36+/-0.643 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 4 leaves, 1.50+/-0.866 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 10 leaves, 1.30+/-0.640 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.009 s
% # System time : 0.004 s
% # Total time : 0.013 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14734/SEU161+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------