↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:01:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 14:13:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.57/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.57/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.57/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.57/0.64  
% 0.57/0.64  % Result      :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.57/0.64  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.57/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  % File     : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.58/0.64  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.58/0.64  % Problem  : Basic properties of sets, theorem 65
% 0.58/0.64  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.58/0.64  % English  :
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.58/0.64  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.58/0.64  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.58/0.64  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t65_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.58/0.64  % Rating   : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.13 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v4.1.0, 0.09 v4.0.1, 0.13 v4.0.0, 0.12 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.58/0.64  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Number of atoms       :   14 (   2 equ)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 0.58/0.64  %                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   4 avg)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.64  %            Number of variables   :   14 (  12   !;   2   ?)
% 0.58/0.64  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.58/0.64  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.58/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.64        ( in(A,B)
% 0.58/0.64       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(l25_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.64        ~ ( disjoint(singleton(A),B)
% 0.58/0.64          & in(A,B) ) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(l28_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.64        ( ~ in(A,B)
% 0.58/0.64       => disjoint(singleton(A),B) ) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.64        ( disjoint(A,B)
% 0.58/0.64       => disjoint(B,A) ) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(t65_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.58/0.64      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.64        ( set_difference(A,singleton(B)) = A
% 0.58/0.64      <=> ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  fof(t83_xboole_1,axiom,
% 0.58/0.64      ! [A,B] :
% 0.58/0.64        ( disjoint(A,B)
% 0.58/0.64      <=> set_difference(A,B) = A ) ).
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.58/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.58/0.64  %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.58/0.64  %VarNum:26(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.58/0.64  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.58/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.58/0.64  %SharedTerms:12
% 0.58/0.64  %goalClause: 14 16
% 0.58/0.64  [12]P1(a1)
% 0.58/0.64  [13]~P1(a2)
% 0.58/0.64  [14]~P3(a4,a3)+E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)
% 0.58/0.64  [16]P3(a4,a3)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)
% 0.58/0.64  [17]~P2(x172,x171)+P2(x171,x172)
% 0.58/0.64  [20]~P3(x202,x201)+~P3(x201,x202)
% 0.58/0.64  [15]P3(x151,x152)+P2(f5(x151),x152)
% 0.58/0.64  [18]~P2(x181,x182)+E(f6(x181,x182),x181)
% 0.58/0.64  [19]P2(x191,x192)+~E(f6(x191,x192),x191)
% 0.58/0.64  [21]~P3(x211,x212)+~P2(f5(x211),x212)
% 0.58/0.64  %EqnAxiom
% 0.58/0.64  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.58/0.64  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.58/0.64  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.58/0.64  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.58/0.64  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x51,x53),f6(x52,x53))
% 0.58/0.64  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x63,x61),f6(x63,x62))
% 0.58/0.64  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.58/0.64  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.58/0.64  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.58/0.64  [10]P3(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P3(x101,x103)
% 0.58/0.64  [11]P3(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x113,x111)
% 0.58/0.64  
% 0.58/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(24,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (~P2(x241,x242)+E(f6(x242,x241),x242)),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,18])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (~P2(f5(a4),a3)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,16])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (~E(f6(f5(a4),a3),f5(a4))+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,26])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (P2(f5(a4),a3)+E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,15])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (P2(a3,f5(a4))+E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,17])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(34,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[33,18])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (~E(f6(f5(a4),a3),f5(a4))),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,28])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(39,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     (P2(a3,f5(a4))),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,19])).
% 0.58/0.65  cnf(46,plain,
% 0.58/0.65     ($false),
% 0.58/0.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[39,37,24]),
% 0.58/0.65     ['proof']).
% 0.58/0.65  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.58/0.65  % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------