↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU162+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:10:52 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.24s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  21   ~;  16   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t65_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( set_difference(X1,singleton(X2)) = X1
    <=> ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t65_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l28_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X2)
     => disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l28_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t83_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    <=> set_difference(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).

fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
     => disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(l25_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( disjoint(singleton(X1),X2)
        & in(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l25_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( set_difference(X1,singleton(X2)) = X1
      <=> ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t65_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X2)
     => disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l28_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( set_difference(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) != esk3_0
      | in(esk4_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( set_difference(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = esk3_0
      | ~ in(esk4_0,esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X29,X30] :
      ( ( ~ disjoint(X29,X30)
        | set_difference(X29,X30) = X29 )
      & ( set_difference(X29,X30) != X29
        | disjoint(X29,X30) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t83_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X25,X26)
      | disjoint(X26,X25) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_r1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( in(X21,X22)
      | disjoint(singleton(X21),X22) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk4_0,esk3_0)
    | set_difference(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) != esk3_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( set_difference(X1,X2) = X1
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( disjoint(X2,X1)
    | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | disjoint(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk4_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ disjoint(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,singleton(X2))
    | in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = esk3_0
    | ~ in(esk4_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | set_difference(X1,X2) != X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = esk3_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ~ disjoint(singleton(X19),X20)
      | ~ in(X19,X20) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l25_zfmisc_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(singleton(X1),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    disjoint(singleton(esk4_0),esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU162+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:46:13 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.24/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.24/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------